Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 1;14(2):172–179. doi: 10.1089/bio.2015.0088

Table 1.

Immunoreactive Peptide Levels in the Hypothalamus After Different Tissue Handling Procedures

Tissue handling procedure DYNB LARG LARG/DYNB MEAP
Nonstabilized brain
Standard procedure, freeze (n = 5) 20.1 ± 0.88 44.5 ± 1.83 2.23 ± 0.12 73.4 ± 2.18
 Wet ice 15 minutes, freeze (n = 4) 18.8 ± 0.65 47.9 ± 2.50 2.55 ± 0.09 91.3 ± 7.06
 Freeze, stabilize frozen before extraction (n = 6) 17.8 ± 1.48 7.29 ± 0.99** 0.37 ± 0.06** 221 ± 26.0**
 Stabilize, freeze (n = 4) 35.1 ± 2.14* 2.28 ± 0.22* 0.07 ± 0.01* 418 ± 74.6*
Stabilized brain
 Freeze (n = 4) 36.6 ± 1.05* 2.61 ± 0.18* 0.07 ± 0.01* 286 ± 47.8*
 Wet ice 15 minutes, freeze (n = 4) 35.8 ± 4.79* 3.25 ± 0.11*,# 0.09 ± 0.01* 263 ± 15.9*

Stabilization was tested at different time points according to Figure 1 and the peptide levels were compared with standard procedure (in bold) that is, the brain was rapidly freed and the hypothalamus removed and rapidly frozen on aluminum-encased dry ice. In addition, the consequences of keeping the tissue samples on wet ice for 15 minutes were tested in nonstabilized and stabilized brain.

The values represent mean ± SEM and are expressed as fmol/mg tissue.

*

p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared to standard procedure; #p < 0.05, compared to immediately frozen hypothalamus from stabilized brain.

DYNB, dynorphin B; LARG, Leu-enkephalin-Arg6; MEAP, Met-enkephalin-Arg6-Phe7.