Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Nucl Med. 2016 Jan;41(1):83–85. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000995

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Large lytic lesions were present in the posterior aspects of both iliac bones in this patient, and both sites were found to have intense uptake of both radiotracers (18F-FDG in A and B and 18F-DCFPyL in C and D, red arrowheads). However, 18F-DCFPyL uptake was both visually and quantitatively higher than 18F-FDG. For the right iliac lesion, 18F-FDG uptake yielded SUVmax of 3.3, while for the same lesion 18F-DCFPyL uptake generated SUVmax of 16.6. For the left iliac, 18F-FDG SUVmax was 4.0 while 18F-DCFPyL SUVmax was 13.9. In aggregate, our findings in this patient with metastatic clear cell RCC are suggestive that 18F-DCFPyL may able to identify more lesions and has higher tumor uptake than 18F-FDG. Although a significant body of work has examined the role of 18F-DCFPyL and other small molecule inhibitors targeted against PSMA in the detection of prostate cancer [1-4], the use of such radiotracers for non-prostate applications has been limited to date [5, 6]. This is despite the fact that PSMA is highly expressed on the tumor neovasculature of many solid tumors, including RCC [7, 8]. Indeed, a previous case report has demonstrated the ability of a 68Ga-labeled small molecule inhibitor of PSMA (68Ga-PSMA) to identify sites of disease in a patient with metastatic clear cell RCC [5]. In that report, the authors noted concordance between 18F-FDG and 68Ga-PSMA uptake for all described lesions, though the 68Ga-PSMA PET acquisition was notable for improved lesion conspicuity. In combination with the earlier findings utilizing 68Ga-PSMA, this report confirms that further study with PSMA radiotracers in metastatic RCC is warranted.