Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 5;1(1):67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2015.12.004

Table 2.

Average dose statistics for coplanar VMAT, noncoplanar VMAT, and 4π plans for all 20 patients

Plan type OAR doses (Gy)
Left kidney (mean) Right kidney (mean) Normal liver (mean) Stomach (maximum) Cord (maximum) Body (mean)
cVMAT 1.42a (2.4) 2.04 (2.4) 7.07a (2.6) 11.15 (6.7) 6.69a (3.2) 1.51a (0.6)
nVMAT 1.46a (2.1) 2.09 (2.5) 6.97a (2.8) 10.95a (10.0) 5.74a (4.0) 1.51a (0.6)
0.82 (1.2) 1.70 (1.4) 6.01 (2.3) 7.58 (6.3) 4.00 (3.7) 1.46 (0.6)
PTV D98% (Gy) VL>15 (cm3) V50% (cm3) R50 HI CN
cVMAT 49.62a (9.6) 233.7a (120.8) 271.5b (185.6) 3.66b (0.4) 0.11 (0.03) 0.94 (0.03)
nVMAT 49.59 (9.7) 228.7a (122.3) 287.5b (213.4) 3.77a (0.5) 0.10 (0.02) 0.93 (0.04)
49.42 (9.7) 153.9 (84.5) 210.8 (146.4) 2.82 (0.3) 0.11 (0.03) 0.93 (0.03)

cVMAT, coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy; nVMAT, noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy; OAR, organ at risk; PTV, planning target volume; VL>15, volume receiving >15 Gy.

a

Significantly different from 4π with P < .05 (paired, 2-tailed t test).

b

Significantly different from 4π and other VMAT plan type with P < .05 (paired, 2-tailed t test).