Table 3.

Performance of the SMA and other methods with marginal screening under the homogeneous structure for

Method		Correct_0 (%)	Incorrect_0 (%)		Prediction error
Correlation structure: auto-regressive ()
Raw	56.89	98.5	0.9	0.059	1.033
SMA	61.39	97.6	0.7	0.067	1.038
SMA-I	63.34	97.1	1.0	0.143	1.073
SMA-E	58.77	98.0	1.4	0.151	1.078
aLASSO-U	504.40	6.3	0	0.363	1.183
aLASSO-I	42.25	99.7	18.6	0.556	1.865
HT-U	452.30	17.1	0	0.583	1.291
HT-I	37.95	99.9	24.7	0.727	2.246
Correlation structure: auto-regressive ()
Raw	56.80	98.4	1.3	0.065	1.037
SMA	61.30	97.5	1.0	0.073	1.041
SMA-I	61.55	97.4	1.3	0.143	1.073
SMA-E	57.22	98.2	2.1	0.150	1.075
aLASSO-U	483.15	7.9	0.2	0.362	1.179
aLASSO-I	41.25	99.7	20.2	0.601	1.928
HT-U	441.65	16.6	0.2	0.597	1.288
HT-I	37.6	99.9	25.7	0.782	2.337
Correlation structure: compound symmetry ()
Raw	57.58	98.3	1.5	0.068	1.037
SMA	63.17	97.3	1.2	0.079	1.042
SMA-I	63.91	97.1	1.7	0.168	1.081
SMA-E	57.25	98.4	2.1	0.174	1.083
aLASSO-U	522.9	6.0	0.4	0.400	1.196
aLASSO-I	41.15	99.7	20.5	0.629	2.032
HT-U	464.2	17.7	0.4	0.630	1.309
HT-I	36.55	100.0	27.2	0.818	2.435
Correlation structure: compound symmetry ()
Raw	57.23	98.3	1.9	0.084	1.041
SMA	60.98	97.5	1.9	0.090	1.044
SMA-I	61.86	97.3	2.3	0.172	1.077
SMA-E	57.06	98.3	2.4	0.176	1.078
aLASSO-U	489.35	7.7	1.0	0.394	1.187
aLASSO-I	40.95	99.7	21.4	0.644	1.901
HT-U	452.35	15.4	1.0	0.633	1.301
HT-I	37.45	99.9	25.8	0.759	2.219

Note: and the sample sizes range from 400 to 600. The Correct_0 (%) and Incorrect_0 (%) were based on the dimensions after the SIS procedure. The SMA-E used an external panel of 1000 subjects.