Table 2. Paired analysis of metabolic measure differences between urban and rural siblings.
Measure | Wilcoxon signed-rank test statistics. Rural to urban comparisons |
|
---|---|---|
Lucknow | Hyderabad | |
Fasting glucose (mmol/L) |
n=91 | n=91 |
z= 3.838 | z= 1.598 | |
p= 0.124e-03 | p= 0.110 | |
diff= 0.30 (-0.11-1.00) | diff= 0.11 (-0.22-0.50) | |
Fasting insulin (mU/L) |
n= 90 | n= 91 |
z= 4.535 | z= 2.767 | |
p= 5.765e-06 | p= 0.006 | |
diff= 2.35(-0.40-5.10) | diff= 1.00(-1.30-4.30) | |
HOMA-IR | n= 71 | n= 71 |
z= 4.332 | z= 2.659 | |
p= 0.0148e-03 | p= 0.008 | |
diff= 0.60(-0.18-1.15) | diff= 0.28(-0.25-1.03) | |
BMI (Kg/m2) |
n= 91 | n= 91 |
z= 6.345 | z= 4.908 | |
p= 2.231e-10 | p= 9.210e-07 | |
diff= 4.04(0.64-7.18) | diff= 1.94(-0.20-5.44) | |
Total cholesterol (mmol/L) |
n= 90 | n= 91 |
z= 1.722 | z= 0.267 | |
p= 0.085 | p= 0.789 | |
diff= 0.23(-0.78-1.27) | diff= -0.05(-0.67-0.72) | |
LDL (mmol/L) |
n= 89 | n= 90 |
z= 1.471 | z= -0.026 | |
p= 0.141 | p= 0.979 | |
diff= 0.22(-0.67-1.22) | diff= 0.05 (-0.75-0.60) | |
HDL (mmol/L) |
n= 90 | n= 91 |
z= -0.656 | z= 1.558 | |
p= 0.512 | p= 0.119 | |
diff= -0.01(-0.18-0.18) | diff= 0.05(-0.10-0.21) | |
Triglycerides (mmol/L) |
n= 90 | n= 91 |
z= 2.438 | z= 1.181 | |
p= 0.015 | p= 0.237 | |
diff= 0.31(-0.32-0.86) | diff= 0.09(-0.27-0.41) |