Table 3. Validation summary for constructs derived from original variables.

Construct	Method	Canonical correlation	Wilks' λ / HL				R2 Nagelkerke	ROC
			Wilks' λ	χ2	df	p-value		AUC	SE	p-value	LB95%	UB95%
VS	DA	0.641	0.59	46.86	13	< 0.001	-	0.874	0.04	< 0.001	0.797	0.951
	LR	-	HL	2.79	8	0.947	0.560	0.877	0.04	< 0.001	0.801	0.952
RNFL	DA	0.652	0.58	49.50	11	< 0.001	-	0.876	0.04	< 0.001	0.799	0.952
	LR	-	HL	3.40	8	0.907	0.563	0.874	0.04	< 0.001	0.796	0.951
SPEED	DA	0.656	0.57	51.23	8	< 0.001	-	0.904	0.03	< 0.001	0.836	0.972
	LR	-	HL	8.81	8	0.358	0.593	0.922	0.03	< 0.001	0.862	0.981
ACHROM	DA	0.636	0.60	47.12	8	< 0.001	-	0.888	0.04	< 0.001	0.815	0.962
	LR	-	HL	8.52	8	0.384	0.537	0.888	0.04	< 0.001	0.814	0.961
CHROM-	DA	0.624	0.61	44.98	8	< 0.001	-	0.844	0.05	< 0.001	0.755	0.933
P	LR	-	HL	9.68	8	0.288	0.536	0.845	0.05	< 0.001	0.754	0.935
CHROM-	DA	0.628	0.61	45.71	8	< 0.001	-	0.847	0.04	< 0.001	0.762	0.933
D	LR	-	HL	3.60	8	0.891	0.546	0.847	0.04	< 0.001	0.760	0.934
CHROM-	DA	0.661	0.56	52.31	8	< 0.001	-	0.874	0.04	< 0.001	0.793	0.956
T	LR	-	HL	6.10	8	0.636	0.580	0.879	0.04	< 0.001	0.801	0.958
True-FISP	DA	0.684	0.53	55.89	13	< 0.001	-	0.940	0.03	< 0.001	0.882	0.999
	LR	-	HL	3.08	8	0.929	0.647	0.958	0.02	< 0.001	0.911	1.000

HL, Hosmer and Lemeshow Test