Table 2.
Association between number of transport walking trips (average/day) and Street Smart Walk Score. Data are presented as unadjusted and adjusted incident rate ratios [95% confidence intervals (CI)].
| Unadjusted incidence rate ratio (95% CI) (n = 145) |
Adjusted incidence rate ratio (95% CI)
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 (n = 145) | Model 2a (n = 141) | ||
| Street Smart Walk Score (10-point change) | 1.29 (1.19, 1.39) | 1.30 (1.20, 1.40) | 1.20 (1.12, 1.29) |
| Age (10-year change) | 0.74 (0.54, 1.0) | 0.66 (0.54, 0.90) | 0.78 (0.58, 1.03) |
| Female | 0.86 (0.56, 1.3) | 1.00 (0.69, 1.46) | 0.80 (0.54, 1.16) |
| Lives alone | 1.54 (0.93, 2.54) | – | 1.62 (1.05, 2.50) |
| Very much likes to walkb | 3.20 (2.11, 4.86) | – | 2.10 (1.40, 3.09) |
| Vehicle available | 0.57 (0.39, 0.85) | – | 0.56 (0.40, 0.77) |
| Comorbiditiesc | 0.84 (0.77, 0.93) | – | 0.86 (0.79, 0.94) |
a
Only present variables that are significant at p<0.05.
b
5 (very much likes to walk) vs. 1–4 (not at all liking to walk to somewhat liking to walk) on a 5-point scale.
c
Total number; measured with the Functional Comorbidity Index.