Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 15;6(10):3380–3404. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2052

Table 2.

F ST (above the diagonal) and F ST’ (below the diagonal) between pairs of localities of Ruditapes decussatus, estimated from intron RFLP markers

Car Pon Vil Eo Cam Red Isl Rio Mur Del
Car 0.017a 0.009 0.007 0.078b 0.115b 0.020a 0.02 NA 0.121b
Pon 0.032 0.009 0.011 0.100b 0.149b 0.038b 0.033a NA 0.173b
Vil 0.016 0.016 −0.004 0.091b 0.126b 0.011 0.033b NA 0.190b
Eo 0.013 0.020 0.000 0.069b 0.125b 0.021a 0.034a NA 0.166b
Cam 0.141 0.173 0.160 0.122 0.025a 0.092b 0.114b NA 0.175b
Red 0.195 0.246 0.210 0.209 0.041 0.117b 0.181b NA 0.242b
Isl 0.038 0.070 0.020 0.039 0.167 0.200 0.01 NA 0.185b
Rio 0.038 0.060 0.061 0.062 0.203 0.301 0.020 NA 0.172b
Mur NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Del 0.219 0.300 0.334 0.294 0.300 0.393 0.336 0.306 NA

NA, Not analyzed.

a

Significant at P < 0.05.

b

Significant after sequential Bonferroni correction.