Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 5;2016:7590245. doi: 10.1155/2016/7590245

Table 2.

Clinical trials with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in first-line treatment.

Study No. of patients Design Treatment Primary end point Results p
CRYSTAL [27] 1198 Phase 3, open-label, RCT FOLFIRI versus C-mab + FOLFIRI PFS HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72–0.99 0.048

OPUS [28] 337 Phase 2, open-label, RCT FOLFOX4 versus C-mab + FOLFOX4 ORR 37% versus 61% 0.011

MRC COIN [29] 1630 Phase III, open-label, RCT FOLFOX versus C-mab + FOLFOX OS HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87–1.23 0.67
CapeOx       CapeOx

NORDIC VII [30] 571 Phase III, open-label, RCT Nordic FLOX versus C-mab + FLOX versus C-mab + intermittent FLOX PFS HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72–1.11 0.31

PRIME [31] 1183 Phase III, open-label, RCT FOLFOX4 versus P-mab + FOLFOX4 PFS HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.66–0.97 0.02

Results were analyzed with tumors harboring wild-type exon 2 KRAS

EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; No., number; RCT: randomized controlled trial; C-mab: cetuximab; PFS: progression-free survival; HR: hazard ratio; ORR: objective response rate; OS: overall survival; CapeOx: capecitabine plus oxaliplatin; P-mab: panitumumab.