Table 6.
Results of independent external validation using air pollution data from the routine monitoring sites
Pollutant | N | Mean overprediction (standard deviation) | R 2 |
---|---|---|---|
NO2 (μg/m3)a | 102 | −2.2 (5.8) | 0.75 |
PM2.5 (μg/m3) | 10 | 0.090 (1.5) | 0.83 |
PM2.5 absorbance (10−5 m−1)b,c | 5 | −0.13 (0.28) | 0.52 |
PM10 (μg/m3) | 82 | 0.77 (4.9) | 0.71 |
PMcoarse (μg/m3) | 10 | 1.2 (1.7) | 0.65 |
PNC (particles/cm3)c | 4 | −5058 (17678) | 0.00 |
aNO2 LUR models were applied to 102 sites in total: the area-specific NO2 models were applied to 26 routine monitoring sites within 10 km of the SAPALDIA measurement areas, alpine NO2 models were applied to 4 routine monitoring sites outside of SAPALDIA measurement areas, with altitudes above 1000 m, and non-alpine NO2 models were applied to 72 routine monitoring sites outside of the SAPALDIA measurement areas, with altitudes below 1000 m (Fig. 1); bThe routine monitoring sites measured elemental carbon or soot, but this is known to correlate highly with PM2.5 absorbance; c The PM2.5 absorbance and PNC models included area indicators, and were only applied to the sites within 20 km of the SAPALDIA measurement areas