Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1828–1837. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231

Table 2.

Performance Measures of Digital Screening Mammography with and without CAD

Performance Measure CAD No CAD CAD No CAD Adjusted OR* P value

Events Exams Events Exams Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI OR 95% CI

Cancers detected per 1000 exams
 Total 2145 495,818 558 129,807 4.06 (3.8, 4.4) 4.10 (3.6, 4.6) 0.99 (0.84, 1.15) 0.86
 Invasive 1485 495,818 408 129,807 2.91 (2.7, 3.1) 3.05 (2.7, 3.5) 0.92 (0.77, 1.08) 0.30
 DCIS 660 495,818 150 129,807 1.19 (1.0, 1.3) 0.95 (0.7, 1.2) 1.39 (1.03, 1.87) 0.031
Interval cancers per 1000 exams
 Total 375 495,818 81 129,807 0.76 (0.68, 0.84) 0.62 (0.50, 0.78) 1.14 (0.87, 1.50) 0.33
 Invasive 327 495,818 72 129,807 0.65 (0.57, 0.74) 0.55 (0.42, 0.71) 1.09 (0.82, 1.46) 0.54
 DCIS 48 495,818 9 129,807 0.10 (0.07, 0.13) 0.03 (0.00, 0.24) 1.59 (0.72, 3.51) 0.25
Sensitivity
 Total 2145 2520 558 639 85.3% (83.6, 86.9) 87.3% (84.5, 89.7) 0.81 (0.60, 1.10) 0.18
 Invasive 1485 1812 408 480 82.1% (80.0, 84.0) 85.0% (81.5, 87.9) 0.83 (0.59, 1.17) 0.28
 DCIS 660 708 150 159 93.2% (91.1, 94.9) 94.3% (89.4, 97.1) 0.88 (0.37, 2.07) 0.76
Specificity
 Total 444,356 493,298 118,025 129,168 91.6% (91.0, 92.2) 91.4% (90.6, 92.0) 1.02 (0.94, 1.11) 0.58
 Invasive 444,404 494,006 118,034 129,327 91.5% (90.9, 92.1) 91.3% (90.5, 91.9) 1.02 (0.94, 1.11) 0.58
 DCIS 444,683 495,110 118,097 129,648 91.4% (90.7, 92.0) 91.0% (90.3, 91.7) 1.04 (0.96, 1.13) 0.36
Recall rate per 100 exams 51,087 495,818 11,701 129,807 8.7 (8.1, 9.4) 9.1 (8.4, 9.8) 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) 0.35

CAD, computer-aided detection; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ

*

Odds ratio for CAD vs . No CAD adjusted for site, age group, race/ethnicity, time since prior mammogram and calendar year of the exam using mixed effects model with random effect for exam reader and varying with CAD use.