. 2015 Nov 19;30(6):849–865. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv052

Table IV.

Outcome variables relationship to high, low implementing and control program

	Intervention														Control
					Implementation Level										Spring 2013	Spring 2014
	All Intervention programs				High						Low
	Spring 2013	Spring 2014	P value (I v. C)	Cohen’s d (I v. C)	Spring 2013	Spring 2014	P value (H v. C)	P value (H v. L)	Cohen’s d (H v. C)	Cohen’s d (H v. L)	Spring 2013	Spring 2014	P value (L v.C)	Cohen’s d (L v.C)
Healthy eating^a
Percent of days a program serves a fruit or vegetable	7.2	74.5	<0.001	2.47	10.6	74.0	<0.001	0.895	2.29	−0.15	9.1	79.1	<0.001	2.8	18.2	14.2
Percent of days a program serves a sugar-sweetened food	71.2	18.7	<0.001	−1.29	59.5	8.0	<0.001	0.901	−1.2	−0.01	61.4	8.4	<0.001	−1.33	48.7	52.2
Percent of days a program serves a sugar-sweetened beverage	52.8	8.0	<0.001	−0.86	37.3	8.7	0.008	0.176	−0.72	0.13	31.8	2.9	<0.001	−0.99	25.8	34.7
Physical activity^b
Percent of girls accumulating 30 min of MVPA	23.1	28.0	0.004	0.65	24.8	29.3	0.009	0.299	0.74	0.28	18.8	25.0	0.055	0.35	21.7	18.5
Percent of boys accumulating 30 min of MVPA	37.1	45.4	0.002	0.86	39.5	47.3	0.006	0.328	0.95	0.26	30.6	41.3	0.032	0.54	36.5	34.8

Abbreviations: Intervention (I), Control (C), High Implementation (H), Low Implementation (L)

Statistically significant differences are bolded

^aPrograms considered high implementers if STEPs healthy eating total index score was ≥11 (n = 4)

^bPrograms considered high implementers if STEPs physical activity total index score was above ≥20 (n = 7)