. 2016 Apr 18;82(9):2751–2762. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00247-16

TABLE 3.

Relative abundance of families from all regions

Family^a	Mean relative abundance ± SD^b (%)
Family^a	Great Lakes	Florida	Pacific Ocean
Unclassified	20.51 ± 6.26^A	10.54 ± 3.74^B	9.48 ± 2.60^B
Planctomycetaceae	4.04 ± 1.69^A	5.51 ± 1.65^B	7.53 ± 2.92^C
Rhodobacteraceae	1.90 ± 0.91^A	6.05 ± 4.66^B	7.98 ± 2.71^C
Flavobacteriaceae	1.40 ± 1.12^A	6.49 ± 4.00^B	6.77 ± 4.50^B
Desulfobacteraceae	0.46 ± 0.48^A	6.87 ± 4.86^B	1.87 ± 1.01^C
Sinobacteraceae	2.36 ± 1.54^A	0.61 ± 0.51^B	2.5 ± 1.51^A
Thiotrichaceae	0.13 ± 0.09^A	0.19 ± 0.17^A	3.67 ± 2.37^B
Burkholderiales incertae sedis	5.33 ± 2.35^A	0.07 ± 0.12^B	0.11 ± 0.20^B
Chitinophagaceae	4.81 ± 2.28^A	0.26 ± 0.44^B	0.36 ± 0.30^B
Thioprofundum	0.01 ± 0.06^A	0.84 ± 1.26^B	3.23 ± 1.98^C
Bacillariophyta	0.58 ± 0.84^A	0.60 ± 0.57^A	2.92 ± 3.62^B
Desulfobulbaceae	0.25 ± 0.25^A	3.07 ± 2.16^B	1.51 ± 0.64^C
Thermoanaerobacteraceae	2.25 ± 1.41^A	1.46 ± 0.80^B	0.88 ± 0.36^C
Nocardioidaceae	3.22 ± 3.37^A	0.74 ± 1.08^B	0.48 ± 1.55^B
Rhodospirillaceae	0.61 ± 0.37^A	1.25 ± 0.92^B	1.98 ± 0.95^C
Geobacteraceae	0.59 ± 0.31^A	0.96 ± 0.36^B	2.04 ± 0.91^C
Comamonadaceae	3.84 ± 1.01^A	0.16 ± 0.21^B	0.13 ± 0.22^B
Sphingomonadaceae	3.41 ± 2.98^A	0.24 ± 0.36^B	0.22 ± 0.36^B
Verrucomicrobiaceae	1.43 ± 0.78^A	1.04 ± 0.77^B	1.15 ± 0.52^B
Syntrophobacteraceae	0.95 ± 0.51^A	1.66 ± 2.21^B	1.19 ± 0.69^A
Chromatiaceae	0.20 ± 0.22^A	1.77 ± 0.90^B	1.56 ± 0.54^B
Saprospiraceae	0.32 ± 0.24^A	0.92 ± 1.01^B	1.64 ± 0.65^C

Only families present at a mean level of >1% over the entire data set are shown.

The relative abundance in samples sharing the same superscript letter (A, B, or C) do not differ significantly by ANOVA at an α value of 0.05.