Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 19;11(4):e0153629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153629

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Effect of cold shock (A) or no shock (B) on mating latency. (A) We assayed mating latency at 4 hours (h), 12 h and 30 h post cold shock. Closed bars represent FCB and open bars represent FSB populations. Selection and period had significant effects on mating latency. However, selection × period interaction was not significant. (B) Under no-shock treatment, there was no significant difference in mating latency between FSB and FCB males.