Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 26;74(5):337–351. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw004

Table 3.

Studies analyzed for their use of the National Social Marketing Centre’s social marketing benchmark criteria (SMBC)

Reference(s) Intervention Total SMBC Social marketing benchmark criterion
Results of quality appraisal
Participant orientation Behavior Theory Insight Exchange Competition Segmentation Methods mix
Haerens et al. (2006),30,31 Haerens et al. (2007)32,33 Physical activity and healthy food 7 Education Moderate30; Moderate31; Strong32; Moderate33
Sigmund et al. (2012)34 Healthy Schools project 5 Education Weak
Klakk et al. (2013)35 CHAMPS study DK 6 Support Moderate
Simon et al. (2008)36 ICAPS 5 Education Strong
Thivel et al. (2011)37 Physical activity program 5 Support Weak
Graf et al. (2005)38 CHILT 4 Education Weak
Muckelbauer et al. (2009)39 Promotion of drinking water in schools 8 Education Strong
Brandstetter et al. (2012)40 URMEL-ICE 7 Education Moderate
Siegrist et al. (2013)41 JuvenTUM project 5 Education Moderate
Angelopoulos et al. (2009)42 CHILDREN study 6 Education Strong
Mihas et al. (2010)43 VYRONAS 6 Education Weak
Kristjansdottir et al. (2010),44 Magnusson et al. (2011),45 Magnusson et al. (2012)46 Lifestyle of 7- to 9-year-old children 6 Education Moderate44; Strong45; Moderate 46
Centis et al. (2012)47 Centro Salute G. C. Croce project 5 Education Weak
Sacchetti et al. (2013)48 School-based intervention of PE 5 Education Moderate
Singh et al. (2007),49 Singh et al. (2009)50 DOiT 6 Education Moderate49; Moderate50
Martens et al. (2008)51 Krachtvoer program 6 Education Moderate
Jurg et al. (2006)52 JUMP-in 6 Education Weak
Jansen et al. (2011)53 Lekker Fit! 6 Support Moderate
Ezendam et al. (2012)54 FATaintPHAT 6 Education Moderate
Grydeland et al. (2013)55 HEIA study 6 Education Moderate
Rosário et al. (2013)56 Intervention through teachers 6 Education Strong
Llargues et al. (2011)57 AVall study 5 Education Strong
Tarro et al. (2014)58 EdAl study 7 Education Moderate
Sollerhed et al. (2008)59 Expanded PE in primary school 6 Support Weak
Marcus et al. (2009)60 STOPP 7 Education Moderate
Kriemler et al. (2010)61 KISS program 7 Support Strong
Lakshman et al. (2010)62 Top Grub card game 7 Education Moderate
James et al. (2004)63 CHOPPS 5 Education Moderate
Breslin et al. (2012)64 Sport for LIFE 7 Education Strong
Sahota et al. (2001)65 APPLES 5 Education Weak
De Bourdeaudhuij et al. (2010)66 HELENA study 6 Education Weak
Te Velde et al. (2008)67 Pro Children Project 7 Education Strong

Abbreviation and symbols: PE, physical education; ✓, indicates presence of the criterion; –, indicates absence of the criterion.