Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 16;7(3):1933–1939. doi: 10.1039/c5sc02900g

Table 1. Molecular weights (MWs) and critical micelle concentrations (CMCs; n = 2) of new glucosides (TDTs and NDTs) and a conventional detergent (DDM), and the hydrodynamic radii (Rh; n = 4) of their micelles.

Detergent MW a CMC (μM) CMC (wt%) R h b (nm)
TDT-C9 902.1 47 ± 1.5 0.0042 ± 0.0001 3.4 ± 0.4
TDT-C10 930.1 14 ± 1.0 0.0013 ± 0.0001 4.5 ± 0.2
TDT-C11 958.2 11 ± 1.5 0.0011 ± 0.0001 37 ± 8.0
TDT-C12 986.2 6.0 ± 0.1 0.0006 ± 0.0000 53 ± 1.2
NDT-C9 903.1 26 ± 4.0 0.0023 ± 0.0004 3.1 ± 0.1
NDT-C10 931.2 12 ± 0.5 0.0011 ± 0.0000 3.2 ± 0.1
NDT-C11 959.2 6.1 ± 1.8 0.0005 ± 0.0002 3.5 ± 0.0
NDT-C12 987.3 2.4 ± 0.9 0.0002 ± 0.0001 3.8 ± 0.4
DDM 510.1 170 0.0087 3.4 ± 0.0

aMolecular weight of detergents.

bHydrodynamic radius of detergents measured at 1.0 wt% by dynamic light scattering.