Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Inform. 2016 Mar 10;60:376–384. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.03.004

Table 3.

A Taxonomy of Clarification Questions Utilized During Need Negotiation

Question Type Goal EHR Data Clarification Examples

Relevance threshold To establish the user’s relevance threshold, a mapping of a continuous scale into a binary decision What is the A1c threshold for the diabetes patients that you are looking for?
Ambiguity in conjoined facets To establish the relationship type between conjoined facets Do you only want patients that have both a diagnosis of diabetes and hypertension or patients with a diabetes diagnosis with or without a hypertension diagnosis?
Example concept To ensure an identified facet is relevant to the user’s information need Would patients without Diabetes diagnoses, but taking a medication for diabetes be of interest to you?
Closely related or subset concept To expand or narrow the scope of the user’s information need on the specificity of a particular facet Do you want patients with both types of Diabetes? Type 1 and 2?
Related topical aspects To establish the user’s interest in facets that are conceptually related, but not directly requested Does it matter what treatment protocol the diabetic patients are on?
Acceptability of summaries To define both the user’s expectation of the information retrieved Do you just want to know how many patients fit your criteria?