Table 4.
Coefficient | S.E. | ES | Deviance1 | N Parameters in Model |
AIC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPOCS-A analyses | ||||||
Linear Model | 803.00 | 7 | 820.00 | |||
Intercept (first session value), γ000 | 3.29*** | .055 | N/A | |||
Slope (change over time in weeks), γ100 | −.0054* | .0020 | N/A | |||
Models including group contrasts1 | 771.42 | 13 | 797.42 | |||
Group Differences in Intercept | ||||||
ICBT (1) vs YAS-UC (0) | .57*** | .09 | 1.18 | |||
YAS-ICBT (1) vs YAS-UC (0) | .34** | .11 | .70 | |||
ICBT (1) vs YAS-ICBT (0) | .22* | .10 | .45 | |||
Group Differences in Slope | ||||||
ICBT (1) vs YAS-UC (0) | −.0077 | .0051 | −.37 | |||
YAS-ICBT (1) vs YAS-UC (0) | −.011* | .0053 | −.52 | |||
ICBT (1) vs YAS-ICBT (0) | −.0031 | .0050 | −.15 | |||
TASC analyses | ||||||
Unconditional Model | ||||||
Intercept (post-treatment value), γ00 | 20.23*** | .70 | N/A | |||
Models including group contrasts1 | ||||||
Group Differences in Intercept | ||||||
ICBT (1) vs YAS-UC (0) | 3.39** | 1.13 | .83 | |||
YAS-ICBT (1) vs YAS-UC (0) | −1.62 | 1.44 | −.40 | |||
ICBT (1) vs YAS-ICBT (0) | 5.01*** | 1.19 | 1.22 |
Note. For parsimony, this table includes only parameters of central conceptual interest (e.g., intercepts are not reported for the models examining group differences, parameters are not reported for the control variable, number of sessions).
Analyses of the TASC were completed using multiple imputation. Deviance statistics are not available in the HLM software for the aggregated models from such analyses.
S.E. = Standard Error; ES = effect sizes (Cohen’s d)
p < .05
p < .01
p < .001
ICBT = individual cognitive-behavioral therapy delivered in Kendall et al. study; YAS-ICBT = ICBT delivered in YAS; YAS-UC = usual care delivered in YAS; TPOCS-A = Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy – Alliance scale; TASC = Therapeutic Alliance Scale for Children.