Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2015 Jul 18;75(6):2265–2277. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25729

Table 2.

T1 Relaxation in Volunteers at 7T and 3T Based on Biexponential and Monoexponential Fits to 13 IR-FSE Images

Volunteer T1L (ms) T1S (ms) Short T1, Weight, wS T1* (ms) % Difference (T1*/T1L − 1)a % Voxels
P < 0.05 P < 0.01
7T
 #1 1342 ± 60 53 ± 12 11% ± 2% 1161 ± 60 −13% 99.5% 98.8%
 #2 1347 ± 64 51 ± 19 10% ± 2% 1173 ± 39 −13% 94.8% 80.0%
 #3 1331 ± 77 61 ± 12 11% ± 2% 1106 ± 95 −17% 91.1% 86.9%
 #4 1374 ± 46 64 ± 14 12% ± 2% 1162 ± 38 −18% 97.2% 93.3%
 Meanb 1349 ± 18 57 ± 6 11% ± 1% 1151 ± 30 −15% ± 3% 96% ± 4% 90% ± 8%
3T
 #1 949 ± 54 54 ± 40 7% ± 2% 906 ± 43 −4% 50.8% 27.5%
 #2 928 ± 37 47 ± 48 10% ± 2% 864 ± 26 −7% 43.0% 14.8%
 #3 926 ± 79 49 ± 64 9% ± 3% 869 ± 60 −6% 43.0% 19.3%
 #4 952 ± 67 42 ± 43 8% ± 2% 887 ± 40 −7% 44.3% 20.2%
 Meanb 939 ± 14 48 ± 5 9% ± 1% 882 ± 19 −6% ± 1% 45% ± 4% 20% ± 5%

Values are for an ROI encompassing all of the WM in an axial slice through the basal ganglia. Subjects #2–4 are the same volunteer at both field strengths.

a

Gives the error in the fitted T1* seen in monoexponential fits to all data compared with the biexponential long component T1L.

b

Mean ± standard deviation of the mean across all volunteers at that field strength.