Table 3.
Subscale 1: Self | Subscale 2: Other MSM | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Subscale 1a | Subscale 1b | Subscale 2a | Subscale 2b | |||||
N = 1,170 | Perceived influence of SEOM on general sexual scripts | Perceived influence of SEOM on condomless sex scripts | Perceived influence of SEOM on general sexual scripts | Perceived influence of SEOM on condomless sex scripts | |||||
Socio-demographics | n (%) | m (SD) | d | m (SD) | d | m (SD) | d | m (SD) | d |
Recruitment source | 0.29** | 0.14 | 0.31*** | 0.27*** | |||||
Men-seeking-men websites | 596 (51) | 2.4 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.7) | 2.8 (0.7) | 2.4 (0.8) | ||||
Other | 574 (49) | 2.6 (0.7) | 2.0 (0.7) | 3.0 (0.6) | 2.6 (0.7) | ||||
Race/Ethnicity† | -- | -- | 0.08 | -- | |||||
White | 821 (70) | 2.5 (0.7) | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) | ||||
Black/African American | 146 (13) | 2.4 (0.8) | 1.9 (0.7) | 2.8 (0.7) | 2.5 (0.9) | ||||
Latino/Hispanic | 102 (9) | 2.6 (0.8) | 1.9 (0.7) | 3.0 (0.7) | 2.6 (0.7) | ||||
Other | 99 (9) | 2.5 (0.8) | 2.0 (0.7) | 3.0 (0.7) | 2.4 (0.7) | ||||
Age (in years)† | 0.16*** | -- | 0.19*** | 0.16*** | |||||
18-29 | 524 (45) | 2.6 (0.8) | 1.9 (0.7) | 3.1 (0.6) | 2.6 (0.7) | ||||
30-39 | 148 (12) | 2.5 (0.8) | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.8 (0.7) | 2.4 (0.8) | ||||
40-49 | 220 (19) | 2.4 (0.7) | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.8 (0.7) | 2.4 (0.7) | ||||
50+ | 278 (24) | 2.4 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.7) | 2.8 (0.6) | 2.4 (0.7) | ||||
Education | -- | 0.14** | -- | 0.14* | |||||
< Associate degree | 437 (38) | 2.5 (0.8) | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.7) | 2.6 (0.7) | ||||
≥ Associate degree | 728 (62) | 2.5 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) | ||||
Housing | 0.27*** | 0.14 | 0.15* | 0.14*** | |||||
Own or rent domicile | 896 (74) | 2.4 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) | ||||
Other | 272 (23) | 2.6 (0.8) | 2.0 (0.7) | 3.0 (0.7) | 2.6 (0.7) | ||||
Urban residence | 0.12 | -- | -- | 0.13 | |||||
Yes | 1,050 (90) | 2.5 (0.7) | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) | ||||
No | 120 (10) | 2.4 (0.9) | 2.0 (0.8) | 2.9 (0.7) | 2.6 (0.8) | ||||
Gay sexual orientation | -- | 0.15 | -- | -- | |||||
Yes | 1,043 (89) | 2.5 (0.7) | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) | ||||
No | 112 (11) | 2.5 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.6) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.8) | ||||
“Out” to almost everyone or everyone | 0.14* | 0.14 | -- | -- | |||||
Yes | 640 (55) | 2.4 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.8) | ||||
No | 525 (45) | 2.5 (0.7) | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.7) | 2.5 (0.7) | ||||
Has a primary partner | 0.29*** | 0.14 | -- | 0.29* | |||||
Yes | 494 (43) | 2.4 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.7) | 2.4 (0.7) | ||||
No | 663 (57) | 2.6 (0.7) | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.6 (0.7) | ||||
HIV-serostatus | 0.29*** | 0.29* | 0.46*** | 0.27*** | |||||
HIV-seronegative/unknown | 995 (85) | 2.5 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.7) | 3.0 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) | ||||
HIV-seropositive | 175 (15) | 2.3 (0.7) | 2.1 (0.7) | 2.7 (0.7) | 2.3 (0.8) | ||||
High levels of negative condom use attitudes | 0.29*** | 1.13*** | 0.17 | 0.43*** | |||||
Yes | 169 (15) | 2.7 (0.7) | 2.6 (0.8) | 3.0 (0.6) | 2.8 (0.7) | ||||
No | 976 (85) | 2.5 (0.7) | 1.8 (0.6) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) | ||||
Preferences for condom use in SEOM† | 0.04 | 0.34*** | -- | -- | |||||
Prefers condoms are used | 236 (21) | 2.5 (0.7) | 1.7 (0.6) | 2.9 (0.7) | 2.5 (0.8) | ||||
Prefers condoms are not used | 384 (33) | 2.6 (0.7) | 2.3 (0.8) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) | ||||
No preference | 533 (46) | 2.5 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.6) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) | ||||
% of SEOM viewed containing C0AI† | 0.05 | 0.32*** | -- | 0.08* | |||||
0-24% | 398 (34) | 2.5 (0.7) | 1.7 (0.6) | 2.9 (0.7) | 2.4 (0.8) | ||||
25-49% | 222 (19) | 2.5 (0.8) | 2.0 (0.6) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) | ||||
50-74% | 388 (33) | 2.4 (0.7) | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.6 (0.7) | ||||
75-100% | 141 (12) | 2.6 (0.8) | 2.4 (0.9) | 2.9 (0.7) | 2.6 (0.8) | ||||
Frequency of SEOM consumption | |||||||||
≥ 1 viewing per day | 0.15** | 0.14*** | -- | -- | |||||
Yes | 661 (57) | 2.5 (0.7) | 2.0 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.8) | ||||
No | 503 (43) | 2.4 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) | ||||
> 30 minutes of viewing per session on average | -- | 0.13*** | -- | -- | |||||
Yes | 479 (41) | 2.5 (0.7) | 2.0 (0.8) | 2.9 (0.7) | 2.5 (0.8) | ||||
No | 683 (59) | 2.5 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.7) | 2.9 (0.6) | 2.5 (0.7) |
Note. C0AI = condomless anal intercourse; SEOM = sexually explicit online media; m = mean; SD = standard deviation; d = Cohen's d
p < 0.001
p < 0.01
p < 0.05
effect size calculated using Cohen's f.