Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Res. 2015 Oct 19;53(4-5):588–600. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1066744

Table 3.

Socio-demographic, attitudinal, and sexually explicit online media (SEOM) consumption characteristics of 1,170 men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States by PI-SEOM subscales.

Subscale 1: Self Subscale 2: Other MSM
Total Subscale 1a Subscale 1b Subscale 2a Subscale 2b
N = 1,170 Perceived influence of SEOM on general sexual scripts Perceived influence of SEOM on condomless sex scripts Perceived influence of SEOM on general sexual scripts Perceived influence of SEOM on condomless sex scripts

Socio-demographics n (%) m (SD) d m (SD) d m (SD) d m (SD) d
        Recruitment source 0.29** 0.14 0.31*** 0.27***
        Men-seeking-men websites 596 (51) 2.4 (0.7) 1.9 (0.7) 2.8 (0.7) 2.4 (0.8)
        Other 574 (49) 2.6 (0.7) 2.0 (0.7) 3.0 (0.6) 2.6 (0.7)
        Race/Ethnicity -- -- 0.08 --
        White 821 (70) 2.5 (0.7) 2.0 (0.7) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.7)
        Black/African American 146 (13) 2.4 (0.8) 1.9 (0.7) 2.8 (0.7) 2.5 (0.9)
        Latino/Hispanic 102 (9) 2.6 (0.8) 1.9 (0.7) 3.0 (0.7) 2.6 (0.7)
        Other 99 (9) 2.5 (0.8) 2.0 (0.7) 3.0 (0.7) 2.4 (0.7)
        Age (in years) 0.16*** -- 0.19*** 0.16***
        18-29 524 (45) 2.6 (0.8) 1.9 (0.7) 3.1 (0.6) 2.6 (0.7)
        30-39 148 (12) 2.5 (0.8) 2.0 (0.7) 2.8 (0.7) 2.4 (0.8)
        40-49 220 (19) 2.4 (0.7) 2.0 (0.7) 2.8 (0.7) 2.4 (0.7)
        50+ 278 (24) 2.4 (0.7) 1.9 (0.7) 2.8 (0.6) 2.4 (0.7)
        Education -- 0.14** -- 0.14*
        < Associate degree 437 (38) 2.5 (0.8) 2.0 (0.7) 2.9 (0.7) 2.6 (0.7)
        ≥ Associate degree 728 (62) 2.5 (0.7) 1.9 (0.7) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.7)
        Housing 0.27*** 0.14 0.15* 0.14***
        Own or rent domicile 896 (74) 2.4 (0.7) 1.9 (0.7) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.7)
        Other 272 (23) 2.6 (0.8) 2.0 (0.7) 3.0 (0.7) 2.6 (0.7)
        Urban residence 0.12 -- -- 0.13
        Yes 1,050 (90) 2.5 (0.7) 2.0 (0.7) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.7)
        No 120 (10) 2.4 (0.9) 2.0 (0.8) 2.9 (0.7) 2.6 (0.8)
        Gay sexual orientation -- 0.15 -- --
        Yes 1,043 (89) 2.5 (0.7) 2.0 (0.7) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.7)
        No 112 (11) 2.5 (0.7) 1.9 (0.6) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.8)
        “Out” to almost everyone or everyone 0.14* 0.14 -- --
        Yes 640 (55) 2.4 (0.7) 1.9 (0.7) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.8)
        No 525 (45) 2.5 (0.7) 2.0 (0.7) 2.9 (0.7) 2.5 (0.7)
        Has a primary partner 0.29*** 0.14 -- 0.29*
        Yes 494 (43) 2.4 (0.7) 1.9 (0.7) 2.9 (0.7) 2.4 (0.7)
        No 663 (57) 2.6 (0.7) 2.0 (0.7) 2.9 (0.6) 2.6 (0.7)

HIV-serostatus 0.29*** 0.29* 0.46*** 0.27***
        HIV-seronegative/unknown 995 (85) 2.5 (0.7) 1.9 (0.7) 3.0 (0.6) 2.5 (0.7)
        HIV-seropositive 175 (15) 2.3 (0.7) 2.1 (0.7) 2.7 (0.7) 2.3 (0.8)

High levels of negative condom use attitudes 0.29*** 1.13*** 0.17 0.43***

        Yes 169 (15) 2.7 (0.7) 2.6 (0.8) 3.0 (0.6) 2.8 (0.7)
        No 976 (85) 2.5 (0.7) 1.8 (0.6) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.7)

Preferences for condom use in SEOM 0.04 0.34*** -- --

        Prefers condoms are used 236 (21) 2.5 (0.7) 1.7 (0.6) 2.9 (0.7) 2.5 (0.8)
        Prefers condoms are not used 384 (33) 2.6 (0.7) 2.3 (0.8) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.7)
        No preference 533 (46) 2.5 (0.7) 1.9 (0.6) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.7)

% of SEOM viewed containing C0AI 0.05 0.32*** -- 0.08*

        0-24% 398 (34) 2.5 (0.7) 1.7 (0.6) 2.9 (0.7) 2.4 (0.8)
        25-49% 222 (19) 2.5 (0.8) 2.0 (0.6) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.7)
        50-74% 388 (33) 2.4 (0.7) 2.0 (0.7) 2.9 (0.6) 2.6 (0.7)
        75-100% 141 (12) 2.6 (0.8) 2.4 (0.9) 2.9 (0.7) 2.6 (0.8)

Frequency of SEOM consumption

        ≥ 1 viewing per day 0.15** 0.14*** -- --
        Yes 661 (57) 2.5 (0.7) 2.0 (0.7) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.8)
        No 503 (43) 2.4 (0.7) 1.9 (0.7) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.7)
> 30 minutes of viewing per session on average -- 0.13*** -- --
        Yes 479 (41) 2.5 (0.7) 2.0 (0.8) 2.9 (0.7) 2.5 (0.8)
        No 683 (59) 2.5 (0.7) 1.9 (0.7) 2.9 (0.6) 2.5 (0.7)

Note. C0AI = condomless anal intercourse; SEOM = sexually explicit online media; m = mean; SD = standard deviation; d = Cohen's d

***

p < 0.001

**

p < 0.01

*

p < 0.05

effect size calculated using Cohen's f.