Table 3.

Statistical significant results from Kruskal Wallis tests

Types of Web 2.0 tools	Occupation	Gender	Age
Social networking tool (e.g., Yammer, Facebook)	p = .000	-	p = .001
Learning Management System (e.g., MyLO, Moodle)	p = .000	-	p = .000
Web authoring tool	-	-	.035
Wiki	p = .000	p = .017	p = .000
SmartBoard	-	-	p = .007
eReader	p = .026	-	-
Social Bookmarking	-	-	p = .027
Digital stylus for writing/drawing	-	-	p = .000
Video capture tool	-	-	p = .000
Video/slide viewing (e.g., YouTube)	p = .003	-	p = .001
Slide creation tool (e.g., PowerPoint, Slideshare)	p = .044	-	-
Audio recording tool	-	-	p = .002
Audio listening tools (podcasts)	-	-	p = .012
Desktop capture (e.g., Echo 360, Camtasia)	-	-	p = .032
Web conferencing (e.g., Elluminate)	-	-	p = .008

Asymptotic Significances are displayed. The significance level is .05. Only results that are statistically significant (<.05) are displayed in this table