Skip to main content
Chinese Medical Journal logoLink to Chinese Medical Journal
. 2015 Feb 5;128(3):291–294. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.150087

Nerve Growth Factor for the Treatment of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3: An Open-label Study

Song Tan 1, Rui-Hao Wang 1, Hui-Xia Niu 1, Chang-He Shi 1, Cheng-Yuan Mao 1, Rui Zhang 1, Bo Song 1, Shi-Lei Sun 1, Xin-Jing Liu 1, Hai-Man Hou 1, Yu-Tao Liu 1, Yuan Gao 1, Hui Fang 1, Xiang-Dong Kong 2, Yu-Ming Xu 1,
PMCID: PMC4837856  PMID: 25635421

Abstract

Background:

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) is the most common subtype of SCA worldwide, and runs a slowly progressive and unremitting disease course. There is currently no curable treatment available. Growing evidence has suggested that nerve growth factor (NGF) may have therapeutic effects in neurodegenerative diseases, and possibly also in SCA3. The objective of this study was to test the efficacy of NGF in SCA3 patients.

Methods:

We performed an open-label prospective study in genetically confirmed adult (>18 years old) SCA3 patients. NGF was administered by intramuscular injection (18 μg once daily) for 28 days consecutively. All the patients were evaluated at baseline and 2 and 4 weeks after treatment using the Chinese version of the scale for assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA).

Results:

Twenty-one SCA3 patients (10 men and 11 women, mean age 39.14 ± 7.81 years, mean disease duration 4.14 ± 1.90 years, mean CAG repeats number 77.57 ± 2.27) were enrolled. After 28 days of NGF treatment, the mean total SARA score decreased significantly from a baseline of 8.48 ± 2.40 to 6.30 ± 1.87 (P < 0.001). Subsections SARA scores also showed significant improvements in stance (P = 0.003), speech (P = 0.023), finger chase (P = 0.015), fast alternating hand movements (P = 0.009), and heel-shin slide (P = 0.001).

Conclusions:

Our preliminary data suggest that NGF may be effective in treating patients with SCA3.

Keywords: Nerve Growth Factor, Open-label Study, Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3, Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia

INTRODUCTION

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3), also known as Machado–Joseph disease, is the most common subtype of SCA world-wide,[1,2] and is caused by a pathologic CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion in the ATXN3 gene located on chromosome 14q32.12.[3,4] The cardinal clinical characteristics of SCA3 include gait and stance unsteadiness, limb ataxia, dysarthria, oculomotor dysfunction, sensory disorder, pyramidal and extrapyramidal dysfunction, and so on.[1,5] SCA3 is a slowly progressive and unremitting disease,[6,7,8] in which patients generally will become wheelchair-bound and bedridden in the end stage, and the median survival time after disease onset is approximately 21 years.[9] The resulting loss of working ability and reduced survival confer significant disease burden to the patients, their families, and the society. So far, effective treatment measures for this disease are still lacking.[10,11,12,13] Thus, it is of vital importance to explore effective therapeutic options in order to alleviate the symptoms or retard the disease progression in SCA3.

Nerve growth factor (NGF) is the founding member of the neurotrophin family,[14] and is essential for the proper development, patterning, and maintenance of the mammalian nervous system.[15] Previous studies have revealed that NGF specifically targets sensory and sympathetic neurons in the peripheral nervous system, as well as basal forebrain cholinergic neurons in the central nervous system.[16,17] There is also growing evidence to support the role of NGF in the development, differentiation, and maintenance of the human cerebellar connectivity. In this context, NGF and its high-affinity receptor tachykinin receptor antagonist (TkrA) have been found on the human cerebellar neurons and their neurites.[18,19] These data imply that NGF may have neuroprotective effects on cerebellar neurons and hence might serve as a therapeutic candidate of SCA3. Therefore, this clinical pilot study was set forth to examine the efficacy of NGF in patients with SCA3.

METHODS

This study was an open-label clinical trial assessing the efficacy of NGF in patients with SCA3; it was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from November 2011 to November 2012. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org; ChiCTR-ONC-11001954). All study procedures were in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and all recruited subjects have provided written informed consents.

Ataxia patients with family history were screened at the Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and referred for genetic testing at the Department of Genetic Diagnosis. Patients who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (1) ataxia patients with family history were checked and diagnosed by two independent doctors, then the genotype SCA3 was confirmed by genetic test; (2) older than 18 years; and (3) willing to give informed consent, will be recruited. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) allergy to neurotrophin; (2) with concomitant severe systematic diseases or psychiatric disorders; (3) unable to finish the scale for assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) score; (4) refuse to attend the study, and (5) ataxias attributed to secondary causes (such as alcohol or drug abuse and toxic exposure). All enrolled patients underwent standard neurological, electrophysiological and neuroimaging examinations, and the SCA3 subtype was classified according to these clinical findings.[20]

Murine derived NGF (mNGF) (Xiamen Bioway Biotech Co., Ltd. China) used in this study was extracted and purified from the submandibular gland of the male mouse and has high homology in the amino acid sequence with human NGF.[21] The mNGF has been safely used in a series of clinical studies.,[22,23] and has been approved by China Food and Drug Administration. mNGF was administered peripherally by intramuscular injection at the dose of 18 μg once daily for 4 weeks consecutively.

Clinical disease severity was assessed by the Chinese version of SARA.[24,25] It has been proven to have good reliability and validity among Chinese patients with degenerative cerebellar. The SARA evaluates axial (gait, stance, sitting), speech, and appendicular (finger chase, nose-finger test, fast alternating hand movements (FAHMs), and heel-shin slide) functions. The SARA sum score ranges from 0 to 40 with 0 indicating no ataxia and 40 the most severe ataxia, thus deterioration or improvement of disease severity is, respectively, represented by an increase or decrease of the SARA score. For each patient, Chinese version of SARA was performed at the baseline, 2 weeks (midpoint) and 4 weeks (endpoint) after treatment. These SARA evaluations were all videotaped and reviewed independently by two other investigators who did not attend the original assessment in a random order. The average of score rated by these two evaluators was denoted as the final SARA score. The primary outcome measure was the change of SARA score after treatment compared with that at baseline.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables were expressed as frequencies or proportions where appropriate. The observed changes of SARA score after treatment from baseline were analyzed with nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All the analyses were performed using the SPSS Statistical Package 17.0 (SPSS Inc., USA).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with genetically confirmed SCA3 were enrolled in this study. The baseline clinical characteristics of these patients were presented in Table 1. There were 10 men (47.6%) and 11 women (52.4%). The mean age was 39.14 ± 7.81 years, the mean age of onset was 35.00 ± 6.53 years, the mean disease duration was 4.14 ± 1.90 years, and the mean CAG repeats number was 77.57 ± 2.27.

Table 1.

Baseline clinical characteristics of 21 SCA3 patients

Patient number Gender Age (years) Age at onset (years) Duration (years) Peripheral neuropathy Pyramidal signs Cerebellar atrophy CAG repeats number
1 Male 31 27 4 No Yes No 81
2 Male 43 38 5 Yes No Yes 77
3 Female 53 43 10 Yes No Yes 75
4 Male 39 34 5 No Yes No 77
5 Female 46 42 4 Yes No Yes 78
6 Female 39 36 3 No Yes Yes 77
7 Male 30 28 2 No Yes Yes 80
8 Female 25 23 2 No Yes No 82
9 Male 22 21 1 No Yes No 82
10 Male 37 33 4 No No No 79
11 Female 35 32 3 Yes Yes Yes 78
12 Female 47 41 6 No Yes No 76
13 Male 41 38 3 Yes Yes Yes 76
14 Female 38 33 5 No Yes No 77
15 Male 44 38 6 No Yes Yes 75
16 Male 31 28 3 No Yes Yes 79
17 Female 44 41 3 No Yes Yes 74
18 Female 45 40 5 No Yes No 76
19 Female 43 38 5 No Yes Yes 78
20 Female 47 44 3 No Yes No 75
21 Male 42 37 5 Yes No Yes 77

SCA3: Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3.

The mean SARA score dropped from 8.48 ± 2.40 to 6.94 ± 2.34 (P < 0.001) and 6.30 ± 1.87 (P < 0.001) after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, respectively [Table 2]. Significant decrease in subsections SARA scores was also observed in stance (P = 0.008 and 0.003), speech (P = 0.046 and 0.023), finger-chase (P = 0.026 and 0.015), FAHMs (0.015 and 0.009), and heel-shin slide (P = 0.006 and 0.001) at 2 and 4 weeks after therapy, respectively. The mean improvement in total SARA score was 2.18 ± 1.30 (ranging from 0 to 5.75) in our study.

Table 2.

Scores of SARA and its subsections at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks after NGF therapy

SARA score Baseline Midpoint (2-week) Endpoint (4-week) P1* P2
Total 8.48 ± 2.40 6.94 ± 2.34 6.30 ± 1.87 <0.001 <0.001
Gait 2.38 ± 0.52 2.21 ± 0.56 2.26 ± 0.49 0.149 0.102
Stance 2.29 ± 0.46 1.81 ± 0.60 1.60 ± 0.80 0.008 0.003
Sitting 0.02 ± 0.11 0.02 ± 0.11 0.00 ± 0.00 1.000 0.317
Speech 0.69 ± 0.60 0.60 ± 0.54 0.50 ± 0.47 0.046 0.023
Finger chase 0.37 ± 0.50 0.23 ± 0.37 0.18 ± 0.25 0.026 0.015
Nose-finger test 0.05 ± 0.22 0.04 ± 0.12 0.00 ± 0.00 0.655 0.317
FAHM 1.51 ± 1.07 1.12 ± 0.88 1.07 ± 0.93 0.015 0.009
Heel-shin slide 1.19 ± 0.58 0.88 ± 0.42 0.69 ± 0.40 0.006 0.001

*Comparisons between midpoint of therapy and baseline; Comparisons between endpoint of therapy and baseline. SARA: Scale of the assessment of rating of ataxia; FAHM: Fast alternating hand movements; NGF: Nerve growth factor.

DISCUSSION

Currently, there are few effective measures for treatment of SCA3.[26,27] One previous study has shown that insulin-like growth factor-1, one of the neurotrophic factors, may be effective in reducing the disease progression of SCA3.[28] Previous studies have reported that NGF can improve cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer's disease and may also have potential therapeutic roles in other neurodegenerative diseases.[29,30,31] Postmortem histopathological study in patients with SCA3 has revealed considerable neuronal loss at the cerebellar Purkinje cell layer and the four deep cerebellar nuclei.[32] NGF can prevent neuronal death or age-related atrophy in the adult brain by inhibiting apoptosis of cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain,[33] and it would be reasonable to postulate that it may also inhibit the apoptosis in the cerebellum neurons expressing tyrosine kinase A (TrkA) and serve as a potential therapy for SCA3.

Our current pilot data suggest that NGF might be an effective treatment for SCA3. Such treatment effect is observed as early as 2 weeks after therapy and sustained after 4 weeks. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the efficacy of NGF in SCA3. We postulate such therapeutic effects might be mediated by two mechanisms. First, peripheral administration of NGF may have a direct effect on the cerebellum. Postmortem study has shown that NGF and its high-affinity receptor TkrA are distributed in the neurons of the human cerebellum cortex and its deep nuclei throughout life.[18,19] These findings support the involvement of NGF in the development, differentiation and maintenance of the cerebellar connectivity. Although the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has low permeability to large proteins, some autoradiography studies suggested ED that blood-borne NGF and its subunit β-NGF can cross the BBB of mice and arrive at the brain parenchyma by direct permeation.[34,35] Second, the therapeutic effect of NGF might also be mediated via the proprioceptive sensation system. It has been reported that most (87%) of the SCA3 patients had somatosensory evoked potential abnormalities, especially in the lower limbs, which was due to degenerative lesions in the dorsal column of the spinal cord.[36,37] TrkA immunoreactive fibers have been found in the dorsal column of rats.[38] Hence, NGF therapy may improve stance and heel-knee-shin slide due to improved proprioception. These two proposed mechanisms may explain the observed improvement after therapy and substantiate the use NGF to treat a patient with SCA3.

Our study had several limitations. First, it was an open-label study, in which the observed therapeutic efficacy might be contributed by placebo effects. However, in one randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of varenicline in SCA3 patients, the mean improvements of SARA score in the therapeutic group, and the placebo group were 1.97 and 0.86, respectively.[12] The SARA score improvement of 2.18 in our current study is unlikely to be accounted for by placebo effect alone. Furthermore, SARA is a reliable and valid scale to linearly assess the ataxia symptoms, and changes of SARA scores exceeding 1.1 points are considered clinically relevant.[39] Other limitations include the small sample and short duration of follow-up. Nevertheless, our pilot data suggest that NGF may be a promising treatment for patients with SCA3. A large-scale randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial would be worthwhile to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of NGF in SCA3 patients.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Prof. Tetsuo Ashizawa, Prof. Subramony and Prof. Guang-Bin Xia (all from Department of Neurology, University of Florida) for their help in the design of this study. We thank Prof. Desmond Yat-Hin YAP, (from Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong) for his help in revising the manuscript. We also would like to thank the patients and their families for participating in this study.

Footnotes

Edited by: Jian Gao

Source of Support: This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant (No. 81471158), The Innovation Team Fund of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1404311).

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Schöls L, Bauer P, Schmidt T, Schulte T, Riess O. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: clinical features, genetics, and pathogenesis. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:291–304. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00737-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tang B, Liu C, Shen L, Dai H, Pan Q, Jing L, et al. Frequency of SCA1, SCA2, SCA3/MJD, SCA6, SCA7, and DRPLA CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion in patients with hereditary spinocerebellar ataxia from Chinese kindreds. Arch Neurol. 2000;57:540–4. doi: 10.1001/archneur.57.4.540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Takiyama Y, Nishizawa M, Tanaka H, Kawashima S, Sakamoto H, Karube Y, et al. The gene for Machado-Joseph disease maps to human chromosome 14q. Nat Genet. 1993;4:300–4. doi: 10.1038/ng0793-300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kawaguchi Y, Okamoto T, Taniwaki M, Aizawa M, Inoue M, Katayama S, et al. CAG expansions in a novel gene for Machado-Joseph disease at chromosome 14q32.1. Nat Genet. 1994;8:221–8. doi: 10.1038/ng1194-221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Soong BW, Paulson HL. Spinocerebellar ataxias: an update. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20:438–46. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3281fbd3dd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jardim LB, Hauser L, Kieling C, Saute JA, Xavier R, Rieder CR, et al. Progression rate of neurological deficits in a 10-year cohort of SCA3 patients. Cerebellum. 2010;9:419–28. doi: 10.1007/s12311-010-0179-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.França MC, Jr, D’Abreu A, Nucci A, Cendes F, Lopes-Cendes I. Progression of ataxia in patients with Machado-Joseph disease. Mov Disord. 2009;24:1387–90. doi: 10.1002/mds.22627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jacobi H, Bauer P, Giunti P, Labrum R, Sweeney MG, Charles P, et al. The natural history of spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2, 3, and 6: a 2-year follow-up study. Neurology. 2011;77:1035–41. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822e7ca0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kieling C, Prestes PR, Saraiva-Pereira ML, Jardim LB. Survival estimates for patients with Machado-Joseph disease (SCA3) Clin Genet. 2007;72:543–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00910.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ogawa M. Pharmacological treatments of cerebellar ataxia. Cerebellum. 2004;3:107–11. doi: 10.1080/147342204100032331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Underwood BR, Rubinsztein DC. Spinocerebellar ataxias caused by polyglutamine expansions: a review of therapeutic strategies. Cerebellum. 2008;7:215–21. doi: 10.1007/s12311-008-0026-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zesiewicz TA, Greenstein PE, Sullivan KL, Wecker L, Miller A, Jahan I, et al. A randomized trial of varenicline (Chantix) for the treatment of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. Neurology. 2012;78:545–50. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318247cc7a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ristori G, Romano S, Visconti A, Cannoni S, Spadaro M, Frontali M, et al. Riluzole in cerebellar ataxia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Neurology. 2010;74:839–45. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d31e23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Skaper SD. The neurotrophin family of neurotrophic factors: an overview. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;846:1–12. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-536-7_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chao MV. Neurotrophins and their receptors: a convergence point for many signalling pathways. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:299–309. doi: 10.1038/nrn1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Levi-Montalcini R. The nerve growth factor 35 years later. Science. 1987;237:1154–62. doi: 10.1126/science.3306916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sofroniew MV, Howe CL, Mobley WC. Nerve growth factor signaling, neuroprotection, and neural repair. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1217–81. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Quartu M, Serra MP, Manca A, Follesa P, Lai ML, Del Fiacco M. Neurotrophin-like immunoreactivity in the human pre-term newborn, infant, and adult cerebellum. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2003;21:23–33. doi: 10.1016/s0736-5748(02)00110-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Quartu M, Serra MP, Manca A, Follesa P, Ambu R, Del Fiacco M. High affinity neurotrophin receptors in the human pre-term newborn, infant, and adult cerebellum. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2003;21:309–20. doi: 10.1016/s0736-5748(03)00086-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Riess O, Rüb U, Pastore A, Bauer P, Schöls L. SCA3: Neurological features, pathogenesis and animal models. Cerebellum. 2008;7:125–37. doi: 10.1007/s12311-008-0013-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hallböök F. Evolution of the vertebrate neurotrophin and Trk receptor gene families. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9:616–21. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00011-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lambiase A, Rama P, Bonini S, Caprioglio G, Aloe L. Topical treatment with nerve growth factor for corneal neurotrophic ulcers. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1174–80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804233381702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tuveri M, Generini S, Matucci-Cerinic M, Aloe L. NGF, a useful tool in the treatment of chronic vasculitic ulcers in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2000;356:1739–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03212-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tan S, Niu HX, Zhao L, Gao Y, Lu JM, Shi CH, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia. Chin Med J. 2013;126:2045–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schmitz-Hübsch T, du Montcel ST, Baliko L, Berciano J, Boesch S, Depondt C, et al. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Neurology. 2006;66:1717–20. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000219042.60538.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ilg W, Bastian AJ, Boesch S, Burciu RG, Celnik P, Claaßen J, et al. Consensus paper: management of degenerative cerebellar disorders. Cerebellum. 2014;13:248–68. doi: 10.1007/s12311-013-0531-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.van de Warrenburg BP, van Gaalen J, Boesch S, Burgunder JM, Dürr A, Giunti P, et al. EFNS/ENS Consensus on the diagnosis and management of chronic ataxias in adulthood. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21:552–62. doi: 10.1111/ene.12341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arpa J, Sanz-Gallego I, Medina-Báez J, Portela LV, Jardim LB, Torres-Aleman I, et al. Subcutaneous insulin-like growth factor-1 treatment in spinocerebellar ataxias: an open label clinical trial. Mov Disord. 2011;26:358–9. doi: 10.1002/mds.23423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lykissas MG, Batistatou AK, Charalabopoulos KA, Beris AE. The role of neurotrophins in axonal growth, guidance, and regeneration. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2007;4:143–51. doi: 10.2174/156720207780637216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Allen SJ, Watson JJ, Dawbarn D. The neurotrophins and their role in Alzheimer's disease. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2011;9:559–73. doi: 10.2174/157015911798376190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tuszynski MH, Thal L, Pay M, Salmon DP, U HS, Bakay R, et al. A phase 1 clinical trial of nerve growth factor gene therapy for Alzheimer disease. Nat Med. 2005;11:551–5. doi: 10.1038/nm1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Scherzed W, Brunt ER, Heinsen H, de Vos RA, Seidel K, Bürk K, et al. Pathoanatomy of cerebellar degeneration in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) and type 3 (SCA3) Cerebellum. 2012;11:749–60. doi: 10.1007/s12311-011-0340-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tuszynski MH. Growth-factor gene therapy for neurodegenerative disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2002;1:51–7. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00006-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pan W, Banks WA, Kastin AJ. Permeability of the blood-brain barrier to neurotrophins. Brain Res. 1998;788:87–94. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)01525-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Loy R, Taglialatela G, Angelucci L, Heyer D, Perez-Polo R. Regional CNS uptake of blood-borne nerve growth factor. J Neurosci Res. 1994;39:339–46. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490390311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Abele M, Bürk K, Andres F, Topka H, Laccone F, Bösch S, et al. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type I. Nerve conduction and evoked potential studies in families with SCA1, SCA2 and SCA3. Brain. 1997;120:2141–8. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.12.2141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schöls L, Linnemann C, Globas C. Electrophysiology in spinocerebellar ataxias: spread of disease and characteristic findings. Cerebellum. 2008;7:198–203. doi: 10.1007/s12311-008-0024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Michael GJ, Kaya E, Averill S, Rattray M, Clary DO, Priestley JV. TrkA immunoreactive neurones in the rat spinal cord. J Comp Neurol. 1997;385:441–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Schmitz-Hübsch T, Fimmers R, Rakowicz M, Rola R, Zdzienicka E, Fancellu R, et al. Responsiveness of different rating instruments in spinocerebellar ataxia patients. Neurology. 2010;74:678–84. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d1a6c9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Chinese Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES