Table 2.

Self-Reported 7-Day Point Prevalence All Tobacco Abstinence Rates at Follow-Up

Follow-up	Group			Pairwise comparisonsa
	CC (N = 354)	LZ (N = 356)	LZ + CC (N = 357)	LZ + CC versus CC	LZ + CC versus LZ	CC vs. LZ
3-month assessment
ITT, %	39.3	44.9	57.7	<.001	.001	.415
Complete case, %, n	51.7, 139/269	50.2, 160/319	67.1 206/307	<.001	<.001	.795
6-Month assessment
ITT, %	37.9	41.9	49.0	.004	.055	.553
Complete case, %, n	48.7, 134/275	47.3, 149/315	56.8, 175/308	.051	.021	.795
RPP (3- and 6-month assessments)
ITT, %	31.6	32.6	43.1	.003	.006	.795
Complete case, %, n	44.1, 112/254	37.9 116/306	52.9 154/291	.045	.001	.415

CC = coach calls group; ITT = intention-to-treat; LZ = lozenge group; LZ + CC = lozenge + coach calls group; RPP = repeated point prevalence.

Bold formatting indicates results reaching statistical significance.

^a p values adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate control procedure. ¹⁷