. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Mindfulness (N Y). 2015 Dec 19;7(2):479–492. doi: 10.1007/s12671-015-0476-6

Table 2.

Hierarchical Regressions of Study group (Cohort 1 and Waitlist) Predicting Post Study Outcomes (Time 2), Controlling for Baseline (N= 34)

Outcome	B	SE B	β	R²	ΔR²	F
CAMM	2.61	1.42	.20^†	.64	.04	27.84^***
SCS	.31	.15	.24^*	.58	.06	21.13^***
SMFQ	−3.23	1.05	−.27^**	.77	.07	51.34^***
STAI	−4.53	2.66	−.20^†	.60	.04	23.56^***
CONN	4.75	2.77	.21^†	.51	.05	16.42^***
SLSS	2.34	1.11	.30^*	.43	.08	11.50^***
PA	.04	.15	.04	.54	.001	18.46^***
NA	−.16	.20	−.09	.57	.01	20.69^***
PSS	−1.79	1.59	−.14	.58	.02	20.13^***

Note. Cohort 1=1, Waitlist = 0. ΔR²= change from the first step that included the baseline. CAMM=Children and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure, SCS=Self-compassion Scale, PSS=Perceived Stress Scale, SMFQ=Mood and Feelings Questionnaire-short form, STAI=Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Scale (trait subscale), CONN=Social Connectedness Scale, SLSS=Student Life Satisfaction Scale, PA=Positive Affect subscale of PANAS, NA=Negative Affect subscale of PANAS;

^†

p < .10,

p < .05,

^**

p < .01,

^***

p < .001.