Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 20;10(4):e0004594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004594

Table 1. Risk factors associated with paradoxical reactions.

Risk factor PR No PR OR (95%CI) p-value
Age mean (SD) 15.2 (12.5) 16.5 (13.4) N/A 0.529*
Gender n (%) Female 36 (24%) 117 (76%) 1
Male 16 (18%) 72 (88%) 0.72 (0.37–1.40) 0.416ǂ
WHO categoryn (%) CAT 1 7 (10%) 62 (90%) 1
CAT 2 36 (27%) 97 (73%) 3.29 (1.38–7.87) 0.007ǂ
CAT 3 9 (23%) 30 (77%) 2.66 (0.90–7.81) 0.076ǂ
site of lesion n (%) Lower limb 20 (17%) 97 (83%) 1
Upper limb 24 (24%) 76 (76%) 1.54 (0.79–2.94) 0.209ǂ
Trunk 8 (44%) 10 (56%) 3.88 (1.36–11.1) 0.011ǂ
Type of lesion n (%) Ulcerative 29 (20%) 113 (80%) 1
Non-ulcerative 23 (23%) 76 (76%) 1.18 (.64–2.19) 0.602ǂ
Vitamin D nmol/Lmean (SD) 66.5 (19.1) 68.3 (17.1) N/A 0.631*
3’UTR TGTG n (%) ins/ins 22 (31%) 48 (69%) 1
ins/del 4 (6%) 63 (94%) 0.14 (0.05–0.44) 0.001ǂ
del/del 1 (13%) 7 (87%) 0.44 (0.04–4.55) 0.494ǂ
D543N n (%) G/G 25 (21%) 96 (79%) 1
G/A 2 (8%) 23 (92%) 3.00 (0.66–13.51) 0.155ǂ
A/A 0 (0%) 0 (0%) N/A
INT4 n (%) G/G 21 (17%) 105 (83%) 1
G/C 5 (28%) 13 (72%) 1.56 (.55–4.43) 0.405ǂ
C/C 1 (100%) 0 (0%) N/A
5’(CA)n n (%) 200/200 9 (14%) 60 (86%) 1
200/other 17 (25%) 52 (75%) 2.18 (.90–5.30) 0.086ǂ
other/other 1 (13%) 7 (87%) 0.98 (.32–2.95) 0.975ǂ

* = t-test

ǂ = Binary logistic regression, PR = paradoxical reaction, OR = Odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.