Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 20.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 15;4:CD009660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009660.pub3

Table 5.

Psychological therapies for parents of children and adolescents with a chronic pain condition

Psychological therapies for parents of children and adolescents with a chronic pain condition
Patient or population: Parents of children with a chronic illness
Settings: Community
Intervention: Psychological therapies
Outcomes Probable outcome with control Probable outcome with intervention Relative effect (95% CI) No of Participants (studies) Quality of the evidence (GRADE) Comments
Parenting behaviour post-treatment (low scores indicate less adverse behaviour ratings) The mean parent behaviour post-treatment in the intervention groups was 0.34 standard deviations lower (1.18 lower to 0. 5 higher) SMD −0.34 (−1. 18 to 0.5) 92
(2 studies)
⊕○○○
very low1,2,3,4,5,6
Child behaviour/disability post-treatment (low scores indicate indicate less adverse behaviour/disability ratings) The mean child behaviour/disability post-treatment in the intervention groups was 0.29 standard deviations lower (0.59 lower to 0. 02 higher) SMD −0.29 (−0. 59 to 0.02) 457
(7 studies)
⊕○○○
very low2,4,5
Child behaviour/disability at follow-up (low scores indicate less adverse behaviour/disability ratings) The mean child behaviour/disability at follow-up in the intervention groups was 0.17 standard deviations lower (0.52 lower to 0. 18 higher) SMD −0.17 (−0. 52 to 0.18) 289
(3 studies)
⊕○○○
very low2,3,5,6
Child mental health post-treatment (high scores indicate poor mental health) The mean child mental health post-treatment in the intervention groups was 0.02 standard deviations lower (0.35 lower to 0.3 higher) SMD −0.02 (−0.35 to 0.3) 356
(4 studies)
⊕⊕○○
low2,5
Child mental health at follow-up (high scores indicate poor mental health) The mean child mental health at follow-up in the intervention groups was 0.02 standard deviations higher (0.23 lower to 0.26 higher) SMD 0.02 (−0.23 to 0.26) 255
(2 studies)
⊕○○○
very low5,6
Child symptoms at post-treatment (low scores indicate lower pain ratings) The mean child symptoms at post-treatment in the intervention groups was 0.39 standard deviations lower (0.67 to 0.11 lower) SMD −0.39 (−0.67 to −0.11) 540
(9 studies)
⊕⊕○○
low1,2
Child symptoms at follow-up (low scores indicate lower pain ratings) The mean child symptoms at follow-up in the intervention groups was 0.38 standard deviations lower (0.86 lower to 0. 1 higher) SMD −0.38 (−0.86 to 0.1) 391
(6 studies)
⊕○○○
very low1,2,3,5,6
SMD: Standardised mean difference
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.
1

Majority of studies included in outcome have unclear or high risk of bias

2

Heterogeneity I2 > 45%

3

Wide confidence intervals

4

Significant proportion of studies use a wait-list control

5

Low number of participants included in the outcome

6

A significant proportion of studies did not report outcomes in published paper