Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 20.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 15;4:CD009660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009660.pub3

ADDITIONAL SUMMARY OF FINDINGS [Explanation]

Psychological therapies for parent mental health
Patient or population: Parents of children with a chronic illness
Settings: Community
Intervention: Psychological therapies
Outcomes Probable outcome with control Probable outcome with intervention Relative effect (95% CI) No of Participants (studies) Quality of the evidence (GRADE) Comments
Parent mental health post-treatment Diabetes (high scores indicate poor mental health) The mean parent mental health post-treatment diabetes in the intervention groups was
0.22 standard deviations higher
(0.08 lower to 0.53 higher)
SMD 0.22 (−0.08 to 0.53) 175 (3 studies) ⊕⊕○○
low1,2
Parent mental health post-treatment Cancer (high scores indicate poor mental health) The mean parent mental health post-treatment cancer in the intervention groups was
0.22 standard deviations lower
(0.46 lower to 0.01 higher)
SMD −0.22 (−0.46 to 0.01) 1010 (9 studies) ⊕○○○
very low1,3,4
Parent Mental Health TBI (high scores indicate high mental health) The mean parent mental health tbi in the intervention groups was
0.49 standard deviations lower
(1.14 lower to 0.16 higher)
SMD −0.49 (−1.14 to 0.16) 72
(2 studies)
⊕○○○
very low1,2,3
Parent Mental Health Asthma (high scores indicate poor mental health) The mean parent mental health asthma in the intervention groups was
0.2 standard deviations lower
(0.66 lower to 0.26 higher)
SMD −0.2 (−0.66 to 0.26) 74
(2 studies)
⊕ ○○○
very low1,2,4
SMD: Standardised mean difference; TBI: traumatic brain injury
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.
1

Majority of studies included in outcome have unclear or high risk of bias

2

Low number of participants included in the outcome

3

Heterogeneity I² > 45%

4

Majority of studies had wait-list control group