Table 2.
Risk of bias and quality assessment for prevalence studies14
Items | Quality score |
---|---|
External validity | |
1. Was the study’'s target population a close representation of the national population in relation to relevant variables? | (1 point) |
2. Was the sampling frame a true or close representation of the target population? | (1 point) |
3. Was some form of random selection used to select the sample, or was a census undertaken? | (1 point) |
4. Was the likelihood of non-response bias minimal? | (1 point) |
Total | (4 points) |
Internal validity | |
1. Were data collected directly from the participants (as opposed to a proxy)? | (1 point) |
2. Was an acceptable case definition used in the study? | (1 point) |
3. Was the study instrument that measured the parameter of interest shown to have validity and reliability? | (1 point) |
4. Was the same mode of data collection used for all participants? | (1 point) |
5. Was the length of the shortest prevalence period for the parameter of interest appropriate? | (1 point) |
6. Were the numerator(s) and denominator(s) for the parameter of interest appropriate? | (1 point) |
Total | (6 points) |