Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 21;7:565. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00565

Table 3B.

Significant differences in the relative abundance of fungal species (%) ± standard error between potting soil with and without 2% chitin (n = 5) and their possible functions reported in literature.

Phylum Family Genus Treatment
Increase or decrease Functions (reference)
Control 2% chitin
Ascomycota Cordycipitaceae Lecanicillium 0.09 ± 0.05 1.85 ± 0.33 20x PGP, chitin degradation, biocontrol and induced resistance (Goettel et al., 2008; Hirano et al., 2008; Ownley et al., 2010; Van Nam et al., 2014; Nguyen et al., 2015)
Pseudorotiaceae Pseudogymnoascus 0.96 ± 0.30 3.46 ± 0.26 4x Biocontrol (Tagawa et al., 2010)
Pseudorotiaceae Pseudeurotium 81 ± 0.42 0.12 ± 0.02 0.07x /
Zygomycota Mortierellaceae Mortierella 3.21 ± 1.73 58.13 ± 2.55 18x Chitin degradation (Kim et al., 2008) and biocontrol (Tagawa et al., 2010)

PGP, Plant growth promotion. Species in bold mean a significant increase in the relative abundance in the chitin treatment as compared to the control treatment. Species underlined mean a significant decrease in the relative abundance in the chitin treatment as compared to the control treatment.