Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 9;42:202–214. doi: 10.1007/s10886-016-0678-y

Table 3.

Mean (±SE) concentration of prunasin in roots expressed per root dry mass of Prunus serotina seedlings in function of time, light treatments, combinations of seedlings, and mulching, and interactions. The different letters indicate that the mean values are significantly different in Tukey’s a posteriori test at α = 0.05 (α – level of significance). DOY – day of year, LL - low light (10 %), ML - medium light (25 %), HL - high light (100 %), P – three P. serotina seedlings (monoculture), Q + P + L – three Quercus petraea + six P. serotina + mulching with P. serotina leaves

Effects N Mean ± SE (mg g−1 DM)
Control May 9 3.45 ± 0.52
Time of sampling June (DOY 176) 34 19.95 ± 2.12 a
August (DOY 238) 36 39.50 ± 3.85 b
September (DOY 269) 36 18.51 ± 4.90 a
Light LL 36 30.33 ± 4.37 a
ML 34 27.52 ± 4.41 ab
HL 36 20.50 ± 4.41 b
Competition P 52 26.02 ± 3.88
Q + P + L 54 26.18 ± 3.42
Time of sampling × light 176 × LL 12 16.68 ± 4.24 a
176 × ML 10 26.51 ± 3.10 a
176 × HL 12 17.74 ± 2.42 a
238 × LL 12 32.79 ± 6.60 a
238 × ML 12 45.45 ± 5.98 a
238 × HL 12 40.25 ± 7.43 a
269 × LL 12 41.53 ± 8.36 a
269 × ML 12 10.42 ± 3.28 b
269 × HL 12 3.57 ± 0.73 b
Time of sampling × competition 177 × P 16 21.28 ± 3.38
177 × Q + P + L 18 18.77 ± 2.77
238 × P 18 36.60 ± 6.32
238 × Q + P + L 18 42.40 ± 4.57
269 × P 18 19.65 ± 8.10
269 × Q + P + L 18 17.37 ± 6.01
Light × competition LL × P 18 30.02 ± 6.57
LL × Q + P + L 18 30.65 ± 6.17
ML × P 16 24.66 ± 7.64
ML × Q + P + L 18 30.06 ± 5.12
HL × P 18 23.23 ± 6.65
HL × Q + P + L 18 17.82 ± 6.06