Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 21;16:283. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2317-y

Table 4.

IRR for BC in relation to the studied polymorphisms among postmenopausal women in the DCH cohort

n cases (%) n control (%) IRRa (95 % CI) IRRb (95 % CI) P-valuec
(n = 687) (n = 687)
rs10519297
AA 170 (25) 174 (25) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
AG 341 (50) 361 (53) 0.98 (0.76–1.27) 0.94 (0.72–1.23) 0.15
GG 176 (25) 152 (22) 1.23 (0.90–1.68) 1.25 (0.91–1.72)
AG + GG 511 (75) 513 (54) 1.05 (0.82–1.34) 1.03 (0.80–1.32) 0.83
rs749292
GG 216 (31) 203 (30) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
AG 332 (48) 352 (51) 0.89 (0.69–1.14) 0.89 (0.69–1.16) 0.62
AA 139 (20) 132 (19) 0.97 (0.71–1.33) 0.99 (0.72–1.37)
AG + AA 471 (68) 484 (70) 0.91 (0.72–1.15) 0.92 (0.72–1.17) 0.50
rs1062033
CC 203 (30) 186 (27) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
CG 333 (48) 354 (52) 0.85 (0.66–1.10) 0.85 (0.65–1.11) 0.46
GG 151 (22) 147 (21) 0.92 (0.67–1.25) 0.94 (0.68–1.28)
CG + GG 484 (70) 501 (73) 0.87 (0.68–1.11) 0.88 (0.68–1.12) 0.30
rs10046
AA 182 (27) 188 (28) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
AG 346 (50) 353 (51) 1.02 (0.79–1.31) 0.97 (0.75–1.26) 0.52
GG 159 (23) 146 (21) 1.16 (0.85–1.57) 1.15 (0.84–1.57)
AG + GG 505 (73) 499 (72) 1.06 (0.84–1.34) 1.02 (0.80–1.31) 0.86
rs4646
CC 372 (54) 371 (54) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
CA 265 (39) 262 (38) 1.00 (0.80–1.25) 0.97 (0.77–1.21) 0.95
AA 50 (7) 54 (8) 0.96 (0.63–1.45) 1.00 (0.65–1.53)
CA + AA 315 (46) 316 (46) 0.99 (0.81–1.22) 0.97 (0.78–1.20) 0.78
rs6493487
AA 407 (59) 430 (62) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
GA 245 (36) 218 (32) 1.23 (0.98–1.55) 1.24 (0.98–1.58) 0.16
GG 35 (5) 39 (6) 0.96 (0.60–1.54) 0.88 (0.54–1.44)
GA + GG 280 (40) 257 (38) 1.19 (0.95–1.48) 1.18 (0.94–1.48) 0.16
rs2008691
AA 479 (70) 470 (68) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
GA 179 (26) 198 (29) 0.88 (0.69–1.11) 0.88 (0.69–1.12) 0.25
GG 29 (4) 19 (3) 1.43 (0.80–2.57) 1.45 (0.80–2.64)
GA + GG 208 (30) 217 (32) 0.93 (0.74–1.17) 0.93 (0.74–1.18) 0.57
rs3751591
TT 479 (70) 498 (72) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
TC 182 (26) 176 (26) 1.07 (0.84–1.36) 1.07 (0.83–1.37) 0.60
CC 26 (4) 13 (2) 2.13 (1.04–4.39) 2.12 (1.02–4.43) 0.04
TC + CC 208 (30) 189 (28) 1.13 (0.89–1.42) 1.13 (0.89–1.44) 0.31
CC vs. TT + TCd 26 (4) 13 (2) 2.09 (1.02–4.29) 2.09 (1.00–4.34) 0.05
rs2445762
TT 359 (52) 365 (53) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
TC 278 (40) 276 (40) 1.02 (0.81–1.27) 1.04 (0.83–1.31) 0.74
CC 50 (8) 46 (7) 1.10 (0.72–1.69) 1.19 (0.76–1.85)
TC + CC 328 (48) 322 (47) 1.03 (0.83–1.27) 1.06 (0.85–1.32) 0.61
rs11070844
CC 552 (80) 556 (81) 1.00 (ref.) 1.00 (ref.)
TC 129 (19) 125 (18) 1.06 (0.801–1.39) 1.06 (0.80–1.40) 0.88
TT 6 (1) 6 (1) 1.01 (0.33–3.13) 0.86 (0.27–2.73)
TC + TT 135 (20) 131 (19) 1.06 (0.81–1.38) 1.05 (0.80–1.38) 0.73

aCrude

bAdjusted for parous/nulliparous, number of births, age at first birth, length of school education (low, medium, high), duration of HRT use (years), BMI (kg/m2) and alcohol intake (10 g/day)

c P-value for trend

dCC versus TT and TC