Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2016 May;17(4):472–482. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0629-9

Table 1.

Women in the longitudinal cohort: demographics and sexual risk at baseline overall and by venue race

Total Sample (n=554) Coloured Venues (n = 294) Black Venues (n = 260)

M SD M SD M SD t
Sociodemographics
 Age 33.92 11.63 35.48 12.00 32.15 10.96 3.41***
 Education 5.34 2.18 4.82 2.10 5.92 2.13 −6.15***
N % N % N % χ2

 Race 263.49***
  Coloured 340 61.4 272 92.5% 68 26.2%
  Black 201 36.3 16 5.4% 185 71.2%
  White 11 2.0 5 1.7% 6 2.3%
  Indian 2 0.4 1 0.3% 1 0.4%
 Employed 143 25.8 78 26.5% 64 24.6% 0.24
 Married 150 27.1 102 34.7% 48 18.5% 18.41***
 Electricity 536 96.8 287 97.6% 249 95.8% 1.50
 Tap Water 496 89.5 260 88.4% 236 90.8% 0.80
 Refrigerator 446 80.5 243 82.7% 203 78.1% 1.84

HIV Risk

 Total number of sex partners in past 4 mo. M= 1.41 SD= 2.15 M= 1.24 SD= 1.95 M= 1.60 SD= 2.34 t= −1.94

 Ever HIV tested 453 81.8 229 78.9 224 86.2 6.32*

 HIV positivea 58 10.5 20 6.8 38 14.6 6.87**

Notes:

***

t = t-test statistic;

p<.001, M = Mean, SD = Standard Deviation, N=cell size;

a

among those ever HIV tested;

Educated coded as 0 = no schooling, 1 = up to standard 1 or grade 3, 2 = standard 2–4 or grade 4–6, 3 = standard 5 or grade 7, 4 = standard 6 or grade 8, 5 = standard 7 or grade 9, 6 = standard 8 or grade 10, 7 = standard 9 or grade 11, 8 = standard 10 or grade 12, 9 = certificate or diploma with grade 12, 10 = Bachelor’s degree, and 11 = post graduate degree