Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Sci. 2015 Oct 21;20(2):10.1111/desc.12360. doi: 10.1111/desc.12360

Table 3.

Results of longitudinal mixed models testing the association between fractional anisotropy development and language outcome.

Fiber tract FA Change Language at 24
months1
FA Change
*Language
Adaptive
FDR
F p F p F p p

Splenium 6.76 .012 2.45 .127 9.58 .004 .029*
CC Body 21.38 .000 1.98 .169 6.45 .016 .098
Anterior CC 43.95 .000 1.95 .172 4.40 .044 .264
Arcuate, left 55.13 .000 0.06 .807 0.33 .571 .902
Arcuate, right 66.25 .000 0.15 .701 0.34 .562 .902
ILF, left 23.86 .000 0.00 .976 0.02 .902 .902
ILF, right 19.65 .000 2.26 .143 6.78 .014 .084
Uncinate, left 39.96 .000 0.57 .456 0.05 .830 .902
Uncinate, right 29.37 .000 0.01 .928 1.47 .234 .902
1

Language measure by the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory, Number of words produced at 24 months

*

Significant interaction that survived adaptive false-discovery rate procedure (Hochberg & Benjamini, 1990).

Note: FA, Fractional anisotropy; CC, Corpus Callosum; ILF, Inferior longitudinal fasciculus