Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Diabetes. 2015 Oct 21;17(7):500–508. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12331

Table 3.

Predictors of glycemic control in multiple regression analysis, by model.

B Coefficient SEβ P value

Model 1: Demographics
Adj. R2=15%

Caucasian race −0.73 0.31 0.02
Household income 0.49 0.30 0.10
Single parent household 0.47 0.36 0.19

Model 2: Model 1 + Disease-specific characteristics
Adj. R2=17%

Caucasian race −0.86 0.30 0.006
Basal-bolus insulin therapy 0.75 0.31 0.02
Pre-mixed insulin therapy 0.85 0.40 0.04
Adolescent-reported Adherence (C-SCI) −0.40 0.32 0.21

Model 3: Model 2 + Adolescent-level variables
Adj. R2=16%

Caucasian race −0.75 0.33 0.03
Basal-bolus insulin therapy 0.78 0.32 0.02
Pre-mixed insulin therapy 0.87 0.40 0.03
Cognitive development score (PPVT) −0.006 0.007 0.40

Model 4: Model 3 + Family-level variables
Adj. R2=18%

Caucasian race −0.85 0.35 0.02
Basal-bolus insulin therapy 0.86 0.32 0.01
Pre-mixed insulin therapy 0.73 0.41 0.08
Adolescent responsibility for T1D management (DFRQ; adolescent report) −0.58 0.68 0.40
Adolescent responsibility for T1D management (DFRQ; parent report) 0.62 0.86 0.47
Parent expression of opinion during T1D discussion (DMIS; adolescent report) −0.02 0.22 0.93
Parent expression of opinion during T1D discussion (DMIS; parent report) 0.28 0.22 0.21

Final Model
Adj. R2=17%

Caucasian Race −0.86 0.30 0.006
Basal-Bolus insulin therapy 0.75 0.31 0.02
Pre-mixed insulin therapy 0.85 0.40 0.04

Note: For each step, non-significant findings were dropped from the model. Bold values indicate significance at p < .10.