Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 25;24(5):326–331. doi: 10.1007/s12471-016-0805-y

Table 2.

Impact of inclusion or exclusion of the papillary muscles on LV ejection fraction and mass

Clinical HCM ( n= 55)
Exclusion of PMs from LV mass Inclusion of PMs in LV mass Absolute difference Relative difference a
LVEF (%) 58.2 ± 7.2 60.8 ± 7.6 2.6 ± 1.1 4.5 ± 1.8
LV mass (g/m 2 ) 78.5 ± 28.4 85.2 ± 30.3 6.6 ± 2.5 8.7 ± 2.6
Subclinical HCM mutation carriers ( n = 14)
Exclusion of PMs from LV mass Inclusion of PMs in LV mass Absolute difference Relative difference a
LVEF (%) 57.8 ± 6.1 60.0 ± 6.5 2.2 ± 0.7 3.8 ± 1.0
LV mass (g/m 2 ) 42.7 ± 9.9 46.7 ± 10.5 4.0 ± 0.9 9.5 ± 1.8

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Within group differences: p < .01.LV left ventricle, EF ejection fraction, PMs papillary muscles, HCM hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.aRelative differences in LVEF and mass are both indicated in percentages.