Table 5.
Enteropathogenic bacteria | Strain codea | Resistance profile | MAR indexb |
---|---|---|---|
ETECc | W2-1(LT/STh) | ST | 0.17 |
W2-2 (LT/STh) | C, TC | ||
W2-3 (LT/STh) | AM, S, ST | ||
W2-4 (LT/STh) | AM, NA | ||
W2-6 (LT/STh) | NA | ||
W2-7 (STh) | CI, NA | ||
W2-14 (LT/STh) | AM, AB, S | ||
W2-22 (STh) | NA | ||
W2-51 (LT/STh) | AM, AB, C, TC | ||
W2-61 (LT/STh) | – | ||
EAEC | W2-72 | ST | 0.18 |
W2-75 | AM, NA, S, ST, TC | ||
W2-76 | – | ||
EPEC | W2-38 | AM, AB, C, S, ST, TC | 0.33 |
W2-60 | NA, ST, TC | ||
W2-74 | AM, ST | ||
Salmonella | W2-9 | NA | 0.22 |
W2-16 | NA | ||
W2-26 | AM, C, CN, S, ST, TC | ||
W2-35 | AM, C, CN, S, ST, TC | ||
W2-41 | NA | ||
W2-52 | NA | ||
W2-57 | – | ||
W2-90 | AM, C, TC | ||
ETEC | W3-45 (LT/STh) | AM, AB, NA, S, ST | 0.17 |
W3-46 (LT/STh) | NA | ||
W3-48 (LT/STh) | AM, C, TC | ||
W3-73 (LT) | AM | ||
W3-77 (LT/STh) | – | ||
W3-78 (LT/STh) | NA | ||
W3-79 (LT) | AM, ST | ||
EAEC | W3-8 | AM, S, TC | 0.24 |
W3-20 | AM, CN, S, ST, TC | ||
W3-34 | NA | ||
W3-47 | AM, ST | ||
W3-80 | AM, NA | ||
EPEC | W3-23 | AM, ST | 0.18 |
Salmonella | W3-10 | NA | 0.23 |
W3-17 | AM, C, CT, NA, S, ST, TC | ||
W3-27 | AM, AB, C, CN, FX, NA, S, ST, TC | ||
W3-42 | NA | ||
W3-53 | – | ||
MV58 | – | ||
W3-65 | TC | ||
W3-91 | TC | ||
ETEC | W4-15 (LT) | AM, C, ST, TC | 0.21 |
W4-33 (LT) | – | ||
W4-49 (LT) | – | ||
W4-50 (LT) | AM, CI, CN, NA, S, ST, TC | ||
W4-62 (LT) | AM, C, ST | ||
W4-89 (LT/STh) | NA | ||
W4-88 (LT/STh) | NA | ||
EAEC | W4-21 | – | 0.23 |
W4-25 | – | ||
W4-70 | AM, AB, C, S, ST | ||
W4-71 | AM, AB, C, S, ST | ||
Salmonella | W4-12 | – | 0.20 |
W4-18 | AM, C, S, ST, TC | ||
W4-30 | AM, AB, C, CN, FX, S, ST, TC | ||
W4-37 | AM, CI, CN, FX, S, ST, TC | ||
W4-44 | – | ||
W4-54 | – | ||
W4-59 | – | ||
W4-68 | – | ||
W4-93 | – | ||
EIEC/Shigella | W4-69 | AM | 0.09 |
ETEC | S-5 (LT/STh) | AM, C, ST, TC | 0.16 |
S-13 (LT/STh) | NA | ||
S-24 (LT) | – | ||
S-31 (LT/STh) | NA | ||
S-84 (LT/STh) | NA | ||
S-85 (LT/STh) | AM, C, TC | ||
S-86 (LT) | NA | ||
S-87 (LT) | AM, ST, TC | ||
EPEC | S-19 | AM, ST | 0.18 |
Salmonella | S-29 | AM, AB, C, CI, CN, NA, S, ST, TC | 0.41 |
S-43 | – | ||
EIEC/Shigella | S-55 | AM, FX | 0.14 |
S-56 | AM, FX | ||
S-66 | – | ||
S-67 | AM, FX | ||
ETEC | C-32 (LT/STh) | AM, C, TC | 0.23 |
L-39 (STp) | AM, AB, C, TC | ||
L-40 (LT/STh) | AM, C, TC | ||
L-63 (STp) | AM, NA | ||
L-64 (LT/STh) | AM, NA | ||
L-81 (LT/STh) | AM, AB, C, TC | ||
L-82 (STh) | NA | ||
L-83 (LT/STh) | NA | ||
Salmonella | L-11 | – | 0.36 |
L-28 | AM, C, CI, CN, NA, S, ST, TC | ||
C-36 | AM, C, CI, CN, NA, S, ST, TC | ||
L-92 | – |
–, antibiotic sensitive strain
aStrain code was assigned based on the sample type and sampling site, followed by the numerical order of bacterial isolation: water (W), lettuce (L), chard (C) and soil (S) and sites (2, 3 and 4). No pathogens were detected at site 1
bMAR index calculated for each enteropathogenic category
cETEC strains were characterized by presence of one of the toxin genes (LT/STh/STp)