Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2016 May;43(5):324–331. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000428

Table 1.

Select Characteristics of Index and Partner Participants Enrolled in the Project on Partner Dynamics, 2006–2009

Characteristic Index Participants (N=151) Partner Participants (N=151)
Na % Na %


Sex - Female 73 48.3 78 51.7
Race/ethnicity
 White, non-Hispanic 38 25.2 48 34.0
 Black, non-Hispanic 37 24.5 32 22.7
 Hispanic/Latino 51 33.8 36 25.5
 Other 25 16.6 25 17.7
Age b,c 23.1 ± 3.7 24.8 ± 6.1
 18–24 97 64.2 94 62.3
 25–30 54 35.8 32 21.2
 >30 25 16.6
Number of sex partners, lifetime b 16 ±21.6 12 ± 15.1
Number of sex partners, past 4 months b 1 ± 1.3 1 ± 1.1
Sex frequency (number of acts), past 4 months b 34.5 ± 30.9 43.4 ± 48.3
Age at sexual debut b 16 ± 2.9 16 ± 2.6
History of STD 44 29.1 34 22.7
History of injection drug use 7 4.6 3 2.0
Alcohol/other drugs during sex, past 4 months 78 63.4 88 62.4
Reported description of partnership status
 Just friends 12 8.1 11 7.5
 Dating casually 11 7.4 17 11.6
 Dating exclusively 78 52.3 86 58.5
 Engaged 21 14.1 17 11.6
 Married 21 14.1 13 8.8
 Other 6 4.0 3 2.0
Commitment Scaleb, d 5.9 ± 1.9 6.2 ± 1.9
Perception of partner with more power
 Partner Participant 4 3.2 7 5.0
 Both, but more the partner participant 32 25.6 50 36.0
 Both, but more index participant 75 60.0 67 48.2
 Index Participant 14 11.2 15 10.8
 Not Applicable/Missing 26 12
a

Total number of non-missing observations: race/ethnicity (10 missing for partner participant); history of STD (1 missing for index, 1 missing for partner participants), history of injection drug use (1 missing for partner participant), alcohol or other drug use (28 missing for index; 10 missing for partner participants), description of partnership status (2 missing for index; 2 for partners).

b

Mean ± Standard Deviation.

c

In order to be eligible for the POPD study, index participants had to be between 18–30 years of age. Recruited partner participants did not have an age eligibility criterion.

d

Score based on a 7-question subset of the Investment Model Scale, with higher responses (8 on a given question) representing more commitment, and lower scores (0 on a given question) representing lower commitment.