Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2016 May;43(5):324–331. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000428

Table 5.

Characteristics of Dyad Members’ Distance to Joint Dyad Date of First Sexual Intercourse

Participant Characteristics Proximity to Joint Dyad Report, Date of First Sex
Median Days Wilcoxon P N (%) Within 30 days N (%) Within 90 days N (%) Within 180 days
Age
 Older participants 7 67 (66.3) 76 (75.3) 80 (79.2)
 Younger participants 17 0.2 64 (61.5) 79 (76.0) 85 (81.7)
Sex
 Male participant 12 77 (61.1) 96 (76.2) 102 (81.0)
 Female participant 11 0.7 83 (65.9) 95 (75.4) 102 (81.0)
Role in Study
 Index participant 22 73 (57.9) 93 (73.8) 102 (81.0)
 Partner participant 2 <0.001 87 (69.1) 98 (77.8) 102 (81.0)
Number of sex partners a
 Participant with more sex partners 12 67 (58.8) 85 (74.6) 91 (79.8)
 Participant with fewer sex partners 4 0.2 80 (69.0) 89 (76.7) 95 (81.9)
Commitment b
 Participant reporting greater commitment 7 73 (65.2) 90 (80.4) 91 (79.8)
 Participant describing less commitment 17 0.2 69 (61.6) 82 (73.2) 87 (77.7)
Power in relationship c
 Participant with more power 12 74 (62.7) 92 (78.0) 99 (83.9)
 Participant with less power 8 0.5 77 (65.8) 88 (75.2) 91 (77.8)
a

Number of sex partners in lifetime, ascertained at baseline for index and at partner interview for partners.

b

Score based on 7-question subset of the Investment Model Scale; participant with the higher score within the dyad was coded as having “greater commitment”, and vice-versa.

c

Relationship power was measured using question from the joint dyad questionnaire: “thinking about one another, who would you say has more power in your relationship?”.