Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 11;4(5):763–773. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.819

Table III.

Histomorphological characteristics of the GIST series.

Tumor site

Characteristics Esophagus Stomach Small intestine Rectum All sites
Growth patterna,b, n (%)c
  Luminal/intramural 2 (100.0) 107 (84.3) 46 (68.7) 5 (100.0) 160 (79.6)
  Extramural 0 (100.0) 20 (15.7) 21 (31.3) 0 (100.0) 41 (20.4)
Histomorphological pattern, n (%)c
  Spindle-cell 2 (100.0) 72 (56.7) 45 (67.2) 4 (80.0) 123 (61.2)
  Epitheloid 0 (0.0) 29 (22.8) 9 (13.4) 1 (20.0) 39 (19.4)
  Mixed type 0 (0.0) 26 (20.5) 13 (19.4) 0 (0.0) 39 (19.4)
Mitoses/50 HPFs, n (%)c
  Median (range) 1 (1–1) 3 (0–266) 3 (0–117) 2 (0–6) 3 (0–266)
  Mean ± SD 1.00±1.0 7.83±24.10 12.76 ±23.6 2.60±2.4 9.27±23.6
Mucosal infiltrationb, n (%)c
  Yes 2 (100.0) 85 (66.9) 34 (50.7) 5 (100.0) 126 (62.7)
  No 0 (0.0) 42 (33.1) 33 (49.3) 0 (0.0) 75 (37.3)
Mucosal ulceration, n (%)c
  Yes 2 (100.0) 87 (68.5) 43 (64.2) 4 (80.0) 136 (67.7)
  No 0 (0.0) 40 (31.5) 24 (35.8) 1 (20.0) 65 (32.3)
Nuclear pleomorphismb,d
  Median (range) 0.5 (0–1.0) 1.0 (0–2,5) 1.5 (0–2,5) 1.0 (0–1,5) 1.0 (0–2,5)
  Mean ± SD 0.50±0.707 1.20±0.543 1.33±0.519 0.90±0.548 1.23±0.543
Skeinoid fibers, n (%)c
  Yes 1 (50.0) 56 (44.1) 39 (58.2) 2 (40.0) 98 (48.8)
  No 1 (50.0) 71 (55.9) 28 (41.8) 3 (60.0) 103 (51.2)
Tumor cell necrosisb, n (%)c
  Yes 2 (100.0) 42 (33.1) 22 (32.8) 4 (80.0) 70 (34.8)
  No 0 (0.0) 85 (66.9) 45 (67.2) 1 (20.0) 131 (65.2)
a

According to Agaimy et al (7).

b

Significant differences between GIST sub-localizations using χ2 test or analysis of variance.

c

Percentage per column, i.e., per tumor site.

d

0, no; 1, low; 2, moderate; and 3, strong. GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumor; HPFs, high-power fields; SD, standard deviation.