Table 1.
Authors | Participants | Mean Age ± SD (years) | Design | Leg Power Measure | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robertson et al. 1998 (29) | 26 patients waiting for a primary unilateral knee replacement | 72 ± 8 | Cross-sectional | Nottingham power rig | ↓ leg power in affected leg |
Barker et al. 2004 (44) | 123 patients with clinical knee OA diagnosis | 69.5 ± 8.1 | Cross-sectional | Nottingham power rig | ↓ leg power in adults with knee OA diagnosis |
Juhakoski et al. 2008 (45) | 118 men (n=35) and women (n=83) with hip OA | 66.7 ± 6.5 | Cross-sectional | Concept II dynamometer | Leg power predicts physical function better than pain with hip OA |
Berger et al. 2012 (46) | 40 community-dwelling men (n=21) and women (n=19) with knee OA | 60.7 ± 6 | Cross-sectional | Biodex system III isotonic dynamometer | ↓ leg power is associated with ↑ functional deficit in older adults with knee OA |
Sayers et al. 2010, 2012 (47, 48) | 33 community-dwelling older adults with an OA diagnosis and 38 healthy community dwelling older adults without an OA diagnosis33 | OA diagnosis (67.6 ± 6.8) Without OA diagnosis (HSPT: 74.1 ± 6.4 years, SSST: 70.1 ± 7.0, CON: 72.8 ± 4.1) |
Randomized controlled trial (power training intervention) | Keiser pneumatic leg press | ↑ in leg power was similar among older adults with and without a diagnosis of knee OA33 |
OA= Osteoarthritis; HSPT= High-Speed Power Training; SSST= Slow-Speed Strength Training; CON= Control