Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 30;11(5):3471–3476. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4393

Table II.

Selected studies of single-agent HD-MTX vs. MTX-based polychemotherapy with RTX.

First author/s (year) n MTX dose, g/m2 RTX dose, mg/m2 Other drugs ORR (CRR), %a Median PFS, months Median OS, months Comments (Ref.)
Single-agent HD-MTX
  Herrlinger et al (2002) 37 8   34 (29) 10   25 Prospective (11)
  Batchelor et al (2003) 25 8   74 (52) 12 >23 Prospective (10)
Combined HD-MTX and RTX
  Shah et al (2007) 30 3.5 500 Vincristine, procarbazine   93 (78) N/A; 57% estimated 2-year PFS rate 40 (estimated) Prospective Followed by WBRT (23.4 Gy if CR to induction vs. 45 Gy if less than CR attained); consolidation with IT cytarabine (16)
  Chamberlain and Johnston (2010) 40 8 375   80 (60) 21 29 (estimated) Prospective (14)
  Fritsch et al (2011) 28 3 375 Procarbazine, lomustine   82 (64) 16 17.5 Prospective; all patients ≥65 years (18)
  Birnbaum et al (2012) 17 4 375 Ifosfamide 100 (59) 18 Not reached Retrospective (15)
  Holdhoff et al (2014) 27 8 375   89 (73) 27 Not reached Retrospective (24)
  Present study 12 8 375   91 (58) 22 Not reached Retrospective
a

Following induction with MTX and/or RTX ± additional drugs, but prior to administration of WBRT or consolidation treatment. CR, complete response; CR, CR rate; HD-MTX, high-dose methotrexate; IT, intrathecal; N/A, not available; OS, overall survival; ORR, overall response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; RTX, ritituximab; TMZ, temozolomide; WBRT, whole-brain radiotherapy.