Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Mar 15;37(4):249–256. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2015.1119222

Table 4. Themes expressed regarding acceptability and feasibility of RT for women dementia caregivers by practice method and choice versus random condition.

Themes Viewed as a Concern Viewed as a Value
Random Choice Random Choice
Journal
(n = 14)
Recorder
(n=16)
Journal
(n = 20)
Recorder
(n=9)
Journal
(n = 14)
Recorder
(n=16)
Journal
(n = 20)
Recorder
(n=9)
Acceptability: What were the most and least interesting aspects of the RT intervention?
Helpfulness / benefit 6% 15% 11% 28% 31% 45% 44%
Time commitment 19% 10%
Performing RT skills 11% 14% 12% 5% 11%
Remembering to practice 11%
Practice method 28% 19% 20% 14% 25% 25% 44%
Expressing thoughts 7%
Feasibility: What were the easiest and most challenging aspects of the RT intervention?
Helpfulness / benefit 7% 10% 33%
Time commitment 7% 25% 20% 22%
Performing RT skills 14% 22% 36% 19% 25% 11%
Remembering to practice 11%
Practice method 36% 12% 10% 21% 25% 30% 44%
Collecting thoughts 7% 19% 20% 11%
Expressing feelings 5% 11%
Managing feelings 7% 12% 20%
Privacy 5%

Note: Shaded areas reflect common themes expressed for acceptability and feasibility of RT.