Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 22;11(4):e0152332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152332

Table 2. Comparison of characteristics of patients with type 1 diabetes recruited between January 2012 and April 2013, from the Pediatrics Endocrinology Clinic at the University of Massachusetts Medical School (Categorical variables).

Controls Cases
Variable (High HbA1c) (Low HbA1c) OR [95%CI] p value
n (%) n (%) (Wald)
Responsible pet ownership
  No pet or Low Level of Interaction 103 (54.5) 12 (35.3) Reference
  High level of Interaction 86 (45.5) 22 (64.7) 2.17 [1.02 to 4.65] 0.045
Socio-Economic Status1
  H/A Index 1 52 (27.5) 5 (14.7) Reference
  H/A Index 2 30 (15.9) 8 (23.5) 2.69 [0.80 to 9.07]
  H/A Index 3 33 (17.5) 8 (23.5) 2.25 [0.67 to 7.56]
  H/A Index 4 45 (23.8) 9 (26.5) 2.15 [0.67 to 6.98]
  H/A Index 5 29 (15.3) 4 (11.8) 1.36 [0.34 to 5.52] 0.510
Gender
  Females 83 (47.7) 20 (40.8) Reference
  Males 91 (52.3) 29 (59.2) 1.75 [0.81 to 3.76] 0.153
Race and Ethnicity
  White (non-Hispanic) 154 (81.5) 34 (100.0)
  White (Hispanic) 26 (13.8) 0 (0.0)
  Non-White 9 (4.8) 0 (0.0) Does not converge 0.0022

1 The H/A index used as a proxy for Socio-Economic status consists of 5 categories that combine the hazards/stressor exposure index (H) and the adaptive/socio-demographic character index (A) established by Downs et al. for the zip code of residence reported in patient charts.

2 Yate’s adjusted Chi2 asymptotic 2-sided.