Table 2. Pairwise t-tests to compare log10 (eggs+1) among crossing types in Fig 2.
| Hypothesis | Estimate | Std.Err | t–value | Pr(>|t|) | Answer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Aaa fecundity > SenAae (a vs. b&c)? | 0.821 | 0.156 | 5.244 | <0.0001*** | Yes |
| 2. SenAae with different scaling differ in fecundity (b vs. c)? | 0.128 | 0.168 | 0.760 | 0.4502 | No |
| 3. Aaa x SenAae reciprocal crosses differ in fecundity (d vs. e)? | -0.081 | 0.168 | -0.480 | 0.6332 | No |
| 4. Aaa families > fecundity Aaa x SenAae crosses (a vs. d)? | -0.366 | 0.142 | -2.570 | 0.0125* | Yes |
| 5. SenAae (F) crosses < fecundity than SenAae (Fx G) (b vs. g)crosses? | -0.850 | 0.221 | -3.839 | 0.0003*** | Yes |
| 6. SenAae (G) crosses < fecundity than SenAae (G x F) (c vs. f) crosses? | -0.606 | 0.221 | -2.737 | 0.0080** | Yes |
| 7. SenAae (Gx F) differ in fecundity from SenAae (F G) families (f vs.g)? | -0.172 | 0.239 | -0.722 | 0.4732 | No |