Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 5;105:401–411. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0934-0

Table 5.

Optical coherence tomographic cross-section analysis

DIOR (n = 20) IN.pact falcon (n = 25) p value
Preprocedure 16 (80) 19 (76)
 Stent length analyzed, mm 23.9 [20.1–30.0] 22.0 [15.4–35.7] 0.29
 Mean lumen area, mm2 3.1 [2.3–4.5] 3.6 [2.7–4.5] 0.32
 Minimal lumen area, mm2 1.1 [0.7–1.4] 1.3 [0.9–1.8] 0.13
 Mean stent area, mm2 6.5 [5.6–8.5] 7.2 [6.2–8.9] 0.31
 Minimal stent area, mm2 5.3 [3.6–7.2] 5.4 [4.4–7.1] 0.32
 Mean neointimal area stenosis, % 50.7 [35.4–66.1] 53.0 [43.7–58.9] 0.90
 Maximum neointimal area stenosis, % 80.4 [74.2–88.7] 82.8 [73.6–85.9] 0.79
 Lumen volume, mm3 89.7 [45.8–103.4] 77.4 [60.5–129.1] 0.92
 Stent volume, mm3 156 [132–227] 176 [124–217] 0.92
 Neointimal volume, mm3 66.4 [53.8–134] 87.4 [69.4–102] 0.53
 Neointima occupied stent volume, % 51.5 [34.9–65.1] 53.2 [40.8–58.1] 0.95
Postprocedure 20 (100) 25 (100)
 Stent length analyzed, mm 23.9 [19.7–29.9] 21.8 [15.6–32.0] 0.40
 Mean lumen area, mm2 5.0 [4.1–6.8] 6.2 [5.5–7.1] 0.093
 Minimal lumen area, mm2 3.3 [2.6–4.7] 4.7 [3.0–5.4] 0.10
 Mean stent area, mm2 7.4 [6.0–9.7] 9.8 [8.8–11.0] 0.016
 Minimal stent area, mm2 6.1 [4.1–8.5] 8.2 [7.5–9.2] 0.024
 Mean neointimal area stenosis, % 28.3 [24.4–40.4] 33.5 [30.3–36.8] 0.58
 Maximum neointimal area stenosis, % 47.8 [37.8–55.2] 48.3 [43.1–50.8] 0.96
 Neointima occupied stent volume, % 28.2 [24.8–40.2] 33.6 [29.0–37.4] 0.38
Follow-up 17 (85) 22 (88)
 Stent length analyzed, mm 23.8 [21.2–31.7] 22.4 [18.1–32.8] 0.28
 Mean lumen area, mm2 4.6 [3.4–6.1] 6.0 [5.2–7.8] 0.008
 Minimal lumen area, mm2 2.4 [1.8–3.7] 4.0 [3.1–6.0] 0.009
 Mean stent area, mm2 7.6 [6.1–9.5] 9.1 [7.5–11.5] 0.066
 Minimal stent area, mm2 6.5 [4.4–8.0] 7.7 [5.3–9.8] 0.16
 Mean neointimal area stenosis, % 42.8 [23.7–55.3] 31.6 [24.9–37.5] 0.011
 Maximum neointimal area stenosis, % 66.4 [49.9–76.6] 47.7 [37.3–60.7] 0.010
 Neointima occupied stent volume, % 41.7 [26.0–55.1] 30.5 [23.7–36.5] 0.047