Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb;45(2):122–133.

Table 1:

Comparison of characteristics of pressure ulcer risk assessment tools

Norton scale Waterlow scale Modified Braden scale Cubbin & Jackson scale
Created year 1962 1) 1985 2) 1987 (by Braden et al.) 3) 1991 6)
1991 (by Choi & Song) 4)
1998 (by Pang & Wong) 5)
Specialty Older people/generic Orthopaedic/generic Generic Intensive care
Risk factors to assess pressure sore Physical condition
Mental status
Activity Mobility *
Continence *
Sex
Age
Build
Appetite
Nurses’ visual assessment of skin condition
Mobility *
Continence *
Factors contributing to tissue malnutrition
Neurologic deficits
Major surgery or trauma Medication
Sensory perception
Moisture *
Activity Mobility *
Nutrition status
Friction/shear by Choi & Song
Temperature
Use of medication by Pang & Wong
Skin type Body build
Age
Weight
Skin condition
Mental status Mobility *
Nutrition
Respiration
Continence *
Hygiene
Hemodynamic status

Notes.

1)

Norton, McLaren & Exton-Smith (1962);

2)

Waterlow (1985);

3)

Bergstrom, Braden, Laguzza, & Holman (1987);

4)

Choi & Song (1991)

5)

Pang & Wong (1998);

6)

Cubbin & Jackson (1991);

*

Common risk factors to assess pressure sore