Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb;45(2):122–133.

Table 2:

Characteristics of selected studies

Year of publication Authors Location Types of studies Participants Reference standards Cut off point 2×2 Table Value (95% Confidence interval)
Setting PUs at adm. Age (yr) M:F (n) Total (n) TP FP FN TN SN SP PLR NLR DOR
Norton scale
2005 Defloor & Grypdonck Belgium Pro LTCF PUs (−) 84.6± 7.9 369:1,40 3 1,772 EPUAP (1999) <14 152 710 35 875 0.81 (0.75–0.86) 0.55 (0.55–0.56) 1.82 (1.65–1.95) 0.34 (0.25–0.46) 5.35 (3.60–7.98)
2005 Jalali & Rezaie Iran Pro ICU & wards PUs (−) 60.0 100:130 230 AHCPR (1994) <16 36 0 38 156 0.49 (0.43–0.49) 1.00 (0.89–1.00) - 0.51 (0.51–0.58) -
2005 Kwong et al. China Prospective - PUs (−) 54.1± 16.9 253:176 429 NPUAP (1989) <14 8 164 1 256 0.89 (0.51–0.99) 0.61 (0.60–0.61) 2.28 (1.28–2.56) 0.18 (0.01–0.81) 12.49 (1.57–268.73)
2003 Lee at al. Korea Pro ICU PUs (−) 62.0 64:48 112 AHCPR (1994) <16 34 55 1 22 0.97 (0.86–1.00) 0.29 (0.23–0.30) 1.36 (1.12–1.42) 0.10 (0.01–0.62) 13.60 (1.80–283.14)
2003 Marrie et al. Canada Retro - - 61.0± 18.0 98:90 188 NPUAP (2002) ≤14 37 121 9 21 0.80 (0.69–0.90) 0.15 (0.11–0.18) 0.94 (0.78–1.09) 1.32 (0.59–2.78) 0.71 (0.28–1.85)
2001 Charlier Australia Prospective Hosp. PUs (−) - 29:33 62 AHCPR (1995) <15 3 1 8 50 0.27 (0.08–0.36) 0.98 (0.94–1.00) 13.91 (1.38–344.42) 0.74 (0.64–0.98) 18.75 (1.42–536.60)
1998 Pang & Wong Hong Kong Pro Hosp. PUs (−) 45–92 52:54 106 TDCPS (1983) <16 17 35 4 50 0.81 (0.60–0.94) 0.59 (0.54–0.62) 1.97 (1.29–2.46) 0.32 (0.10–0.75) 6.07 (1.71–23.53)
Waterlow scale
2010 Webster et al. Australia Pro Ward PUs (−) 65.3± 7.7 137:137 274 NPUAP (2007) <15 8 55 4 207 0.67 (0.36–0.89) 0.79 (0.78–0.80) 3.18 (1.61–4.43) 0.42 (0.14–0.82) 7.53 (1.96–31.04)
2009 Serpa et al. Brazil Pro ICU & wards PUs (−) 71.1± 5.5 49:49 98 NPUAP (2007) <17 5 30 2 61 0.71 (0.31–0.95) 0.67 (0.64–0.69) 2.17 (0.86–3.04) 0.43 (0.08–1.08) 5.08 (0.80–40.52)
2008 Compton et al. Germany Pro ICU PUs (−) 66.0 392:306 698 EPUAP (1999) 45 31 76 546 0.37 (0.31–0.43) 0.95 (0.93–0.96) 6.9 (4.50–10.66) 0.66 (0.59–0.75) 10.4 (6.03–18.08)
2005 Jalali & Rezaie Iran Pro ICU & wards PUs (−) 60.0 100:130 230 AHCPR (1994) <16 47 28 27 128 0.64 (0.54–0.72) 0.82 (0.78–0.86) 3.54 (2.41–5.13) 0.45 (0.33–0.59) 7.96 (4.07–15.67)
2001 Charlier Australia Prospective Hosp. PUs (−) 29:33 62 AHCPR (1995) <9 11 23 0 28 1.00 (0.71–1.00) 0.55 (0.49–0.55) 2.22 (1.37–2.22) 0.00 (0.00–0.60) -
1998 Pang & Wong Hong Kong Pro Hosp. PUs (−) 45–92 52:54 106 TDCPS (1983) <16 20 48 1 37 0.95 (0.76–1.00) 0.44 (0.39–0.45) 1.69 (1.24–1.80) 0.11 (0.01–0.62) 15.42 (2.02–322.34)
Modified Braden scale
By Choi & Song
2009 Kim et al. Korea Prospective SICU PUs (−) 58.1± 1.2 145:74 219 AHCPR (1994) <21 38 55 2 124 0.95 (0.83–0.99) 0.69 (0.67–0.70) 3.09 (2.48–3.33) 0.07 (0.01–0.26) 42.84 (9.59–266.55)
2004 Kim & Choi Korea Prospective ICU & ward PUs (−) 60.7 - 211 AHCPR (1996) <23 34 42 0 135 1.00 (0.88–1.00) 0.76 (0.74–0.76) 4.21 (3.39–4.21) 0.00 (0.00–0.16) -
2003 Lee at al. Korea Prospective ICU PUs (−) 62.0 64:48 112 AHCPR (1996) <24 35 63 0 14 1.00 (0.90–1.00) 0.18 (0.14–0.18) 1.22 (1.04–1.22) 0.00 (0.00–0.73) -
1991 Choi & Song Korea Prospective Wards PUs (−) 54.1 89:57 146 Bergstrom (1987) <24 14 11 2 119 0.88 (0.64–0.98) 0.92 (0.89–0.93) 10.34 (5.57–13.58) 0.14 (0.02–0.41) 75.73 (13.54–559.83)
By Pang & Wong
2009 Chan et al. Hong Kong Prospective OS ward PUs (−) 79.4± 10.9 30:167 197 NPUAP (2007) <19 16 68 2 111 0.89 (0.65–0.98) 0.62 (0.60–0.63) 2.34 (1.61–2.65) 0.18 (0.03–0.59) 13.06 (2.75–84.99)
2005 Kwong et al. China Prospective - PUs (−) 54.1± 16.9 253:176 429 NPUAP (1989) <14 8 105 1 315 0.89 (0.51–0.99) 0.75 (0.74–0.75) 3.56 (1.98–4.01) 0.15 (0.01–0.66) 24.00 (3.01–517.73)
Cubbin & Jackson scale
2009 Kim et al. Korea Prospective SICU PUs (−) 58.1± 1.2 145:74 219 AHCPR (1994) <28 38 33 2 146 0.95 (0.83–0.99) 0.82 (0.79–0.83) 5.15 (3.94–5.66) 0.06 (0.01–0.21) 84.06 (18.39–531.62)
2006 Im & Park Korea Prospective ICU PUs (−) 62.1± 1.8 43:35 78 NPUAP (1989) <24 9 8 13 48 0.41 (0.24–0.57) 0.86 (0.79–0.92) 2.86 (1.13–7.07) 0.69 (0.47–0.97) 4.15 (1.17–15.06)
2003 Jun et al. Korea Prospective ICU PUs (±) 62.0 64:48 112 AHCPR (1994) <24 31 30 4 47 0.89 (0.75–0.96) 0.61 (0.55–0.65) 2.27 (1.65–2.71) 0.19 (0.06–0.46) 12.14 (3.58–45.36)
1997 Kim et al. Korea Prospective ICU PUs (−) 56.2 162:91 253 Lowthian (1989) <26 52 45 45 111 0.54 (0.46–0.61) 0.71 (0.66–0.76) 1.86 (1.34–2.55) 0.65 (0.51–0.83) 2.85 (1.63–5.01)

Notes: PUs= Pressure ulcers; TP= True positive; FP= False positive; FN= False negative; TN= True negative; SN= Sensitivity; SP= Specificity; PLR= Positive likelihood ratio; NLR= Negative likelihood ratio; DOR= Diagnosis odds ratio; Retro= Retrospective study; Hosp.= Hospital; ICD-9= International Classification of Diseases version 9; Pro= Prospective study; LTCF= Long term care facilities; NPUAP= National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; EPUAP= European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; AHCPR= Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; TDCPS= Torrence Developmental Classification of Pressure Sore.