Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Res Bull. 2015 Oct 23;123:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2015.10.003

Table 5.

Brain Regions Exhibiting a Session by Video Condition Interaction

M (SD) Beta Weight Estimate
Talairach
Coordinates
Pre-Vaping Session Post-Vaping Session
Region Size
(mm3)
x y z Average
F ratio
E-cig Neutral Contrast E-cig Neutral Contrast
Right inferior parietal lobe,
superior parietal lobe
1647 32 −55 50 6.29 0.01 (0.25) 0.05 (0.22) ns 0.16 (0.13) 0.01 (0.09) ***
Right precuneus, superior parietal
lobe
378 24 −70 46 7.71 0.01 (0.16) 0.09 (0.10) ns 0.25 (0.18) 0.09 (0.14) *
Right middle occipital gyrus,
cuneus
810 27 −87 9 7.72 0.38 (0.19) 0.53 (0.17) * 0.45 (0.24) 0.39 (0.25) ns
Left thalamus, parahippocampal
gyrus, brainstem
837 −20 −25 1 8.99 0.06 (0.10) 0.17 (0.08) ** 0.17 (0.08) 0.12 (0.10) *
Right lingual gyrus, fusiform
gyrus, cuneus
1026 18 −77 −3 6.08 0.09 (0.13) 0.22 (0.13) ** 0.20 (0.16) 0.13 (0.12) **
Right superior temporal gyrus,
middle temporal gyrus
729 47 −9 −4 −2.26 −0.08 (0.10) 0.00 (0.08) * 0.00 (0.10) −0.05 (0.09) *
Right superior temporal gyrus,
middle temporal gyrus
567 57 −16 −5 −1.8 −0.04 (0.09) 0.03 (0.10) * 0.04 (0.06) −0.01 (0.06) *
Right parahippocampal gyrus,
fusiform gyrus
486 33 −43 −11 7.92 −0.10 (0.10) 0.02 (0.10) ** 0.02 (0.09) −0.01 (0.10) ns
Left parahippocampal gyrus 459 −36 −13 −11 7.62 0.00 (0.04) 0.06 (0.02) * 0.07 (0.05) 0.02 (0.09) ns
Right middle temporal gyrus,
inferior temporal gyrus, fusiform
gyrus
810 47 −43 −15 8.41 0.04 (0.11) 0.12 (0.16) ns 0.21 (0.16) 0.10 (0.14) **
Right cerebellum 351 19 −37 −13 −2.59 −0.11 (0.09) −0.01 (0.06) * −0.01
(0.10)
−0.08 (0.09) ns
Left cerebellum 1053 −19 −74 −15 4.18 −0.03 (0.14) 0.11 (0.17) ** 0.14 (0.21) 0.04 (0.21) ***

Note. Stereotaxic coordinates are given for local maxima of activation clusters in Talairach atlas space. ns = not significant

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001.

Beta weight estimates are averaged for the whole region per participant, and then averaged for all participants. The estimates were set up to represent percent signal change from baseline