Table 2.

Polymorphism of kdr intron and neutrality test of 15 Anopheles sinensis populations

Pop	n	S	K	Pi	Tajima’s D	h	Hd	Fu’s Fs	Fu and Li’s D*	Fu and Li’s F*	τ	SSD	r
Southwest
YNLH	42	16	4.570	0.070	0.731	14	0.913	−1.598	0.337	0.553	5.486	0.032*	0.114*
YNNE	32	18	4.776	0.073	0.233	13	0.917	−1.637	0.909	0.815	5.496	0.025	0.095*
SCNJ	44	15	3.744	0.058	0.269	16	0.922	−4.107*	0.678	0.640	5.066	0.011	0.029
South
GXBS	22	16	4.368	0.067	−0.018	17	0.974	−9.984**	−0.135	−0.116	4.879	0.004	0.018
GZLD	32	7	3.601	0.055	3.118	4	0.575	5.319*	1.269	2.138*	8.051	0.260	0.541**
GZCJ	40	15	4.318	0.066	0.715	18	0.924	−5.611*	0.698	0.830	5.539	0.004	0.015
GXLZ	32	11	3.216	0.049	0.563	14	0.823	−4.616*	−0.092	0.132	5.156	0.023	0.088
HNBT	30	13	3.724	0.057	0.445	13	0.871	−3.066*	0.174	0.303	5.830	0.030	0.058
GDQY	36	15	5.335	0.082	1.543	11	0.883	0.529	1.137	1.493	6.641	0.021	0.071
FJXM	26	17	4.028	0.062	−0.338	14	0.923	−4.397*	−0.463	−0.497	2.371	0.003	0.010
Central
HBWX	42	6	1.153	0.018	−0.457	4	0.301	1.111	0.356	0.122	3.000	0.056*	0.497
HNXY	38	5	0.906	0.014	−0.614	4	0.368	0.377	0.204	−0.052	3.000	0.038	0.310
JSSN	30	6	0.759	0.012	−1.424	4	0.251	−0.257	−1.111	−1.403	3.000	0.030	0.511
AHWH	62	6	0.754	0.012	−1.001	5	0.292	−0.700	1.158	0.544	3.000	0.030	0.425
SDHZ	38	29	9.757	0.150	1.431	9	0.728	5.974*	0.770	1.177	18.506	0.080*	0.118*

n number of sequences used, S number of polymorphic (segregating) sites, K average number of pairwise nucleotide differences, Pi nucleotide diversity, h number of Haplotypes, Hd haplotype diversity, τ estimated parameter of population expansion assuming the stepwise growth model (τ = 2 t*MU where t = time in years, MU = mutation rate per locus), SSD the sum of squared deviations; and r Harpending’s raggedness index

*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 (FDR < 0.02)