Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Health. 2016 Jun;41(3):541–549. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0128-8

Table 3.

Bivariable and Multivariable Associations Between Social Media Use and Perceived Emotional Support

Social Media Use Perceived Emotional Supporta
OR (95% CI) P b AORc (95% CI) P b
Time Per Day, min .009 .02
    Q1 (0-30) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
    Q2 (31-60) 1.03 (0.69-1.54) 0.96 (0.65-1.42)
    Q3 (61-120) 0.79 (0.53-1.19) 0.78 (0.50-1.21)
    Q4 (121+) 0.62 (0.41-0.92) 0.62 (0.40-0.94)
Site Visits Per Weekd .30 .18
    Q1 (less than 9) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
    Q2 (9-30) 0.87 (0.58-1.30) 0.77 (0.52-1.16)
    Q3 (31-57) 0.94 (0.63-1.42) 0.86 (0.56-1.33)
    Q4 (58 and above) 0.77 (0.50-1.17) 0.70 (0.45-1.09)

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a

Perceived emotional support is divided into 2 categories; the upper level representing greater support.

b

P value derived using orthogonal polynomial tests for trend.

c

Adjusted for age, sex, race, relationship status, living situation, household income, and education level.

d

Includes Facebook, Twitter, Google+, YouTube, LinkedIn, Instagram, Pinterest, Tumblr, Vine, Snapchat, and Reddit.